guckuck2
2021-09-04 13:05:16
- #1
This is the same argument that the craftsman makes. If you think it through consistently, the client would always be to blame, no matter what the craftsman does, because the client always gives the "ok" for execution – otherwise, the work wouldn’t even be started. From my point of view, not a valid argument.
That’s exactly why precedent cases would be interesting...
Detach yourself from the question of guilt. Only a judge can give you a final answer on that. We are also not suitable as opinion reinforcers against your craftsman.
Better think about how to fix the defect. Involve the craftsman and the electrician in the process.