Cost difference between KSK+WDVS and aerated concrete

  • Erstellt am 2015-02-25 09:22:47

Sebastian79

2015-02-25 13:12:50
  • #1
Especially with you in Niederlehme, the oldest sand-lime brick factory is located. Just ask there directly if they can name companies to which they deliver a lot.
 

Bauexperte

2015-02-25 13:27:10
  • #2
Hello,


Just for the sake of completeness – I really don't care which building material you want to use – because your calculation doesn't make sense to me. 17.5 + 14.0 equals 31.5 cm for me – a difference to 36.5 of just 5 cm all around. How do you come to 20 cm per side?


I strongly doubt that...

Rhenish regards
 

EveundGerd

2015-02-25 13:33:44
  • #3
I would classify it at first glance as an energy saving regulation.
 

Basti2709

2015-02-25 14:27:53
  • #4


True...here I made a mistake in thinking...it's probably 20 cm spread over all 4 walls...



Here I must shamefully admit that I have not yet dealt with all these KfW standards.

The ex-boyfriend of my current partner built a house with the same architect 4 years ago, using the same masonry. Only, instead of gas condensing boiler, he went for geothermal energy with surface collectors. He achieved the KfW 55 standard, I know that 100% this time.

So we have two pretty much identical buildings...only the type of heating differs here. Both houses, from my understanding, retain heat equally well...only that I will probably have higher heating costs in the long run. Now I assumed that with a gas boiler we would reach KfW 70. Whether that is really the case...?

Unfortunately, our budget did not allow for a geothermal heat pump with probe drilling (surface collector not possible).

As I said, you may well be right here too...?
 

Basti2709

2015-02-25 14:36:51
  • #5


Niederlehme is still 120 km north of us... so really South Brandenburg

But I still didn't know that... thanks for the tip.
 

noroot

2015-02-28 10:13:50
  • #6
However, the "KfW standards" always depend on the underlying, currently valid energy saving ordinance - KfW70 of today is significantly more demanding than KfW70 from 10 years ago.
 

Similar topics
19.06.2009Evaluation of the KfW 60 House Contract: Credit Check for House12
21.08.2011Which heating system is suitable for our Kfw 70 house without a basement?15
07.10.2016Which heating is recommended for KfW 55?58
07.04.2016New KfW conditions from 04/201674
19.06.2015Build according to KFW 70 or the Energy Saving Ordinance 201442
09.07.2015Energy Saving Ordinance Proof vs. Energy Saving Ordinance Proof + KfW-70 Proof13
19.10.2015New energy saving regulation from 2016 -> What to build?30
30.03.20162016 KfW Efficiency House 55 according to reference values (U-values)39
23.10.2015Energy Saving Ordinance 2014 - Gas boiler without solar?38
22.12.2015KFW 70 funding still in 201524
24.03.2016How can information such as the Energy Saving Ordinance 2016 be accessed?14
29.01.2016Price difference new construction, KfW 70, KfW 5513
17.02.2016KFW 55 in semi-heated basement - cold basement31
24.02.2016Construction costs to achieve KFW 55 funding29
16.03.2016Chimney no longer allowed from 01.04.16 in KFW 55?19
30.08.2016Construction and Performance Description - Contract including Energy Saving Ordinance 201415
11.02.2017KfW loan in 2017 for a house under the 2016 Energy Saving Ordinance17
24.07.2019Energy Saving Ordinance 2016 or KFW 55 for bungalow with air-water heat pump & controlled residential ventilation, optional photovoltaic47
29.01.2021Is the 2014 Energy Saving Ordinance a KfW standard?24

Oben