KFW 70 funding still in 2015

  • Erstellt am 2015-12-03 13:53:32

Bauexperte

2015-12-04 10:27:18
  • #1
Hello,


That is of course correct. The exciting question is who will manage within the remaining period of 3 weeks to provide a preliminary site plan and complete the BA. All surveyors and architects I have spoken to are up to their hair roots in work.


From my point of view, it only makes sense if the submission is confirmed by the building authorities. Otherwise, clever minds might come up with the idea to submit their BA on New Year’s Day – when the building authority is not working. That somehow does not seem logical to me; but I might be mistaken.

Edit: You could be right; explicit reference to a confirmation of the submission is not made:


**General: Which version of the Energy Saving Ordinance applies to construction projects?

The principle has remained the same as we know it from previous versions of the Energy Saving Ordinance:

    [*]For construction projects that require a building permit or a building notification, the version of the Energy Saving Ordinance applies that was in effect on the day the builder submitted the building application or made the building notification.

    [*]If a construction project does not require a permit but the building code requires that the builder notifies the municipality, the version of the Energy Saving Ordinance applies that was in effect on the day the builder notified the municipality of the project.

    [*]However, if someone plans a construction project for which neither a permit nor a notification is required and no procedure must be followed, the decisive day is the one on which construction actually begins. The version of the Energy Saving Ordinance that is in effect on that day applies bindingly to the entire construction project.

    [*]If a builder submits a building application or makes a building notification before the new Energy Saving Ordinance 2014 comes into effect, he can demand that his building be subject to the requirements of the new Energy Saving Ordinance 2014 if the building authority has not yet made a final decision on his building application or building notification.



**Source: Energy Saving Ordinance online


Rhenish greetings
 

MarcWen

2015-12-04 15:44:50
  • #2


We still have no property, design, or surveyor. So it's ambitious.



Then one could possibly also talk to the caseworker and bring the building application on 04.01.
 

Musketier

2015-12-04 16:01:16
  • #3


The building authority is not the only agency where there are deadlines. If it is like in other authorities (e.g. tax office), then the mailbox is emptied early and possibly postmarked back to the previous day or the last day of emptying. At least at the tax office, there are apparently also mailboxes that flip over at midnight. But I don't think the building authority has such mailboxes.

So if between 31.12. and 03.01. no caseworker happens to be bored and empties the mailbox, 03.01.2016 with a lot of luck could still work. Submission on 04.01.16 to the caseworker would definitely be too late.
 

djon25

2015-12-07 10:41:10
  • #4


I see it the same way. Why does the building application have to be submitted this year?
The regulation runs until "31.03.2016"!
 

Bauexperte

2015-12-07 11:25:55
  • #5
Because the Energy Saving Ordinance changes with the turn of the year - the KfW 70 standard will no longer exist; although the KfW subsidy for a KfW 70 efficiency house (building application still in 2015) only ends on 31.03.16.

Rhenish greetings
 

oleda222

2015-12-07 13:29:54
  • #6
How can that be, construction expert? The standard is even maintained beyond March 31st, only the funding is discontinued. The Energy Saving Ordinance and KfW do not belong in the same category.

The KfW is a (state) bank that aligns its conditions with the Energy Saving Ordinance but creates its own standards (KfW-70, -55, etc.).

And I still have not understood your statement that KfW70 with gas was harder to achieve in 2016 than in 2015.

I think you always justified it by saying that the primary energy factor for electricity was lowered. But according to my lay understanding, that would only put gas at a disadvantage if the reference house is operated with a heat pump and gas now has to compete against the better-rated heat generator heat pump.

Is that so? I would appreciate some clarification.
 

Similar topics
21.08.2011Which heating system is suitable for our Kfw 70 house without a basement?15
07.06.2013Is it mandatory to build according to the Energy Saving Ordinance (2009)?12
17.10.2013Introduction Energy Ordinance 2014 - Evaluation Period18
19.06.2015Build according to KFW 70 or the Energy Saving Ordinance 201442
09.07.2015Energy Saving Ordinance Proof vs. Energy Saving Ordinance Proof + KfW-70 Proof13
19.10.2015New energy saving regulation from 2016 -> What to build?30
30.03.20162016 KfW Efficiency House 55 according to reference values (U-values)39
30.10.2015Can the building application be submitted this year?14
10.01.2017Energy Saving Ordinance 2016 / KFW55 / Gas + Solar in 201628
29.01.2016Price difference new construction, KfW 70, KfW 5513
30.08.2016Construction and Performance Description - Contract including Energy Saving Ordinance 201415
11.02.2017KfW loan in 2017 for a house under the 2016 Energy Saving Ordinance17
16.07.2017Energy Saving Ordinance, KFW55, KFW40 or KFW40 Plus19
04.08.2017Building application or building notification15
15.03.2018KfW 55 or just the Energy Saving Ordinance - gas and preferably no ventilation?23
02.11.2018KfW 55 - Requirement - Not fulfilled - Consequence30
24.07.2019Energy Saving Ordinance 2016 or KFW 55 for bungalow with air-water heat pump & controlled residential ventilation, optional photovoltaic47
20.01.2020Build a multi-family house according to the Energy Saving Ordinance or KFW55?29
29.01.2021Is the 2014 Energy Saving Ordinance a KfW standard?24
30.01.2021The building authority rejects the building application because the house is planned too far back86

Oben