Our exhaust air goes from the technical room in the basement through a light well to the outside.
That could also be done at our place since we also have a light well on the west side, but it doesn’t sound sensible to me. Because, as you yourself confirm, this opens the way for noise from the technical room to the outside.
Have you already received a statement about the nominal air change rate?
I have received values for the volume flow rates and know the room sizes. So I did some calculations:
Basic formula: air change rate = volume flow in m³/h / volume of the room in m³ (with 2.5 m room height)
Floor |
Room |
Size in m² |
Type |
Volume flow (planned) |
Air change rate |
Conclusion |
basement |
Entrance/hallway |
14
|
Supply air |
20
|
0.571428571
|
Barely okay, but is it sensible at all? Better capacity in the office! |
basement |
Office |
21
|
Supply air |
20
|
0.380952381
|
Too low |
basement |
Technical room/laundry room |
16.36
|
Exhaust air |
20
|
|
|
basement |
Storage room |
8.12
|
Exhaust air |
20
|
|
|
ground floor |
Kitchen |
16.17
|
Exhaust air |
40
|
|
|
ground floor |
Living/dining |
35.4
|
Supply air |
40
|
0.451977401
|
Too low |
ground floor |
Pantry |
5.14
|
Exhaust air |
20
|
|
|
ground floor |
WC |
3.44
|
Exhaust air |
20
|
|
|
attic |
Child 1 |
11.57
|
Supply air |
20
|
0.691443388
|
Rather too low |
attic |
Child 2 |
12.11
|
Supply air |
20
|
0.660611065
|
Rather too low |
attic |
Bedroom |
19
|
Supply air |
40
|
0.842105263
|
OK |
attic |
Bathroom |
10.38
|
Exhaust air |
40
|
|
|
|
|
172.69
|
|
320
|
|
|
In addition, I entered the building values into the Vallox planning tool and got different values (30/60 instead of 20/40). To me that smells like a slight undersizing overall, right? The tool from Helios spits out similar values. I suspect the planner just entered this into the tool and somehow ended up with the lower values. However, I expect a bit more here because the planning of a controlled residential ventilation system and its sizing is an individual matter and should not be done based on average values. As a first reference point maybe OK, but a specialist planner should IMHO look beyond that and be able to advise.
How do you see my assessments? Major blunders in the formula?
I am curious about the second round with him.