At least the statement of a regionally typical "normal" II + gable roof house is surprising considering the floor plans, which probably not only I would spontaneously assign to the "Bauhaus" faction.
Personally, I can only assign it to the style of a single-family house with a gable roof. At least to me, Bauhaus means something different. Well, that may also vary from builder to builder.
A drainage system, where one is curious about the architect’s answer, and a laundry chute that "will exist at some point," rather fit a general contractor henchman—not appropriate for the house budget—than an architect (and uncertainty whether furniture can be placed does not fit an "actually too large" house either).
Well, the plan does not come from my pen but from the architect’s, who in turn has to explain to me whether certain arrangements are possible. The mere size does not necessarily make furnishing easier.
I do not understand the reasoning as to how windows are a contraindication that the house will consume the eight hundred grand.
I had rather used it as an indication for the correctness of the calculation. Maybe the wording was not clear enough.
In a 34-zone area, it is by no means unusual that no fixed site occupancy index and floor area ratio specifications are made (since that would already be rudimentarily a development plan). So the indication of a site occupancy index from-to will presumably refer to an inventory. However, the floor area ratio is a somewhat related figure and accordingly very strange with such a large range in one if only one value is given for the other. As expected, a fluctuating value should also be stated there—unless someone at the building authority is also not well informed and you received the values from an intern covering for someone on vacation. Because ignorance regarding the correlation of the two numbers would have to be very extensive for this information.
The meaningfulness of these rather long explanations is not fully clear to me. I personally did not receive the values from anyone but derive them from the architect’s written evaluation referring to the office’s statements.
Best regards