Building Insurance: Questions

  • Erstellt am 2015-05-10 13:56:06

Alex85

2018-04-05 12:12:32
  • #1
Which gang of thieves demolishes a heating system? Well, never say never, but if you worry about such eventualities, you probably take the biggest insurance package available on the market. The insurance is not meant for small stuff, just to mention it again. For example, I wouldn't insure a glass either; I can pay for a broken pane from ongoing income. That's not a risk I need to transfer to someone else because it doesn't financially bother me. For really large glass surfaces (and I don't mean floor-to-ceiling windows or a sliding door), it can make sense again if the surcharge is right.
 

R.Hotzenplotz

2018-04-05 12:17:36
  • #2


The heating system is just an example. I know a couple whose expensive leather sofa sets etc. were slashed with a knife, lights smashed.... (we are planning relatively expensive lights) and so on. I would have thought that all of that is included in "normal" burglary protection. Personally, I find that more important than floods far away from the Rhine.
 

Alex85

2018-04-05 12:42:31
  • #3


All of this is household contents and covered by household insurance, not by building insurance. Only permanently fixed items can be covered by building insurance. Heating and kitchen are still included, but other furniture etc. are household contents.
 

R.Hotzenplotz

2018-04-05 12:50:43
  • #4
Do you know how it looks regarding wall and ceiling lights? Feels like a borderline case. They are practically also permanently connected.
 

Alex85

2018-04-05 13:17:29
  • #5
These are in my opinion furnishings -> household contents. But it's a good question, in the case of a built-in spotlight or something like that ...

Permanently fixed are a window, door, sink, built-in kitchen, tiles.

Ultimately it doesn't matter, you'll have both insurances anyway, right? In the event of damage, one of the two will cover it. Maybe it makes sense to have both with one company, then there will be no quarrels about responsibility.
 

R.Hotzenplotz

2018-04-05 14:37:34
  • #6
The new building will definitely be protected against earthquakes up to 7.5 on the Richter scale. The millennium earthquake in the 18th century was 5.9 and that only 50 km further west in a higher seismic zone. I was advised that it is unnecessary to take out the insurance. That also seems plausible to me.
 

Similar topics
07.10.2016Which heating is recommended for KfW 55?58
02.09.2013Which heating system for prefab houses: air source heat pump, geothermal, solar, photovoltaic17
25.07.2014Energy saving regulation without heating10
27.05.2015Huge problem with condensation on the window34
30.04.2015KFW70 with gas-solar heating65
19.05.2015Heating children's room, bedroom, and bathroom14
27.07.2015New building heating?13
23.10.2015Prefabricated house heating: Gas / Air heat pump / Underfloor heating22
21.12.2015The matter with heating - air/air, air/water, or gas?28
09.05.2016Compliance with the 2016 Energy Saving Ordinance with the following heating14
21.01.2016Is the heating oversized?44
18.05.2016Additional costs when purchasing a plot of land - property tax?55
03.11.2016Which heating system to choose when replacing the heater after 36 years?24
29.12.2018Building insurance with RuV - bad experiences!18
25.05.2018Water damage due to heating. Warranty according to VOB12
08.11.2018Very wet windows overnight20
29.08.2020Building insurance - deductible - large savings possible26
26.03.2022Is building insurance for a garage reasonable?10
30.07.2023Heat pump theft protection - Covered by building insurance?36

Oben