Build a single-family house as KfW55 or Efficiency House 70?

  • Erstellt am 2019-12-27 20:24:12

User0815

2019-12-28 14:16:09
  • #1
For my timber frame house, the improvement from 70 to 55 would only have been about 5,000 EUR more expensive.
 

Sternchen31

2019-12-29 17:28:39
  • #2


Yes, we already plan to utilize as much area as possible for photovoltaics. We also want to organize it ourselves and not through the general contractor. We will definitely have an empty conduit installed.
 

Sternchen31

2019-12-29 17:39:24
  • #3


The entire consultation the day before yesterday was more than poor! She immediately rolled her eyes when we mentioned air heat pump and KFW and said why we want to spend so much money unnecessarily. During the calculation came the sentence "I knew it, nearly €20,000 more just for the insulation you need." I then asked more precisely, and it was said the house is built stone by stone and then plastered; insulation will not be applied at all. The difference would amount to €20,000.

But as I said, the whole consultation was very questionable in some respects.
 

Sternchen31

2019-12-29 17:43:27
  • #4


According to the consultant, the insulation in an energy-efficient house would basically just be the brickwork and then the plaster. Nothing else would be insulated at all and since all the insulation material could be saved here, we would have savings of around €20,000. That was never an option for us anyway, so we will stick with KfW55, but she ranted so extremely against KfW55 and also against the air-to-water heat pump that it seemed strange to us anyway.
 

michert

2019-12-29 18:16:37
  • #5
I wouldn't know how you could save €20k from that. The woman would seem suspicious to me.
 

Scout

2019-12-29 18:24:19
  • #6
I strongly suspect that the KfW-70 house is planned monolithically, i.e. without external thermal insulation composite system (ETICS). To reach KfW-55 level, the general contractor can now only offer an insulation facade. So not just a few centimeters more, but wrapping the entire facade specifically for this purpose. That 20k€ is gone very quickly....

Are there also KfW-70 offers with ETICS? The surcharge should rather be 5 to 10k€.

Air-to-water heat pumps are generally more worthwhile the lower the heat demand is.
 

Similar topics
10.12.2009Subsidies for KFW55 and Sole/Water Heat Pump15
02.09.2015KfW55 versus KfW7012
12.08.2015Is insulation worth it beyond the new construction standard?34
19.05.2021Experiences with brine heat pump491
16.12.2015Is KfW55 worth it instead of KfW70 with an additional cost?16
02.02.2017Construction costs kfw70 vs. kfw55 vs. kfw4030
18.04.2016Air-water heat pump, mechanical ventilation with heat recovery?17
18.08.2016KfW55 with 36 cm brick (im)possible?25
12.11.2016District heating vs air-water heat pump in KfW 40 plus15
03.04.2018New building KfW55 with gas, solar, and controlled residential ventilation with heat recovery43
23.01.2017District heating does not meet KfW55 requirements?!13
11.05.2017Replace gas with heat pump27
07.01.2018Is it worth paying the extra cost for KFW55 or not?37
25.11.2018Heating costs for Kfw55 - Electricity costs seem too high to me26
24.07.2019Energy Saving Ordinance 2016 or KFW 55 for bungalow with air-water heat pump & controlled residential ventilation, optional photovoltaic47
30.11.2020Is estimating KFW55 useful, or is the Energy Saving Ordinance preferable?11
09.07.2021Building according to the Energy Saving Ordinance 2016 or KfW5543
26.03.2022Which is more sensible: heat pump or insulation?33
24.02.2022Photovoltaic system air-water heat pump - profitability single-family house KFW55EE95
02.03.2023Heat pump for KfW55 house 148 sqm99

Oben