Build a single-family house as KfW55 or Efficiency House 70?

  • Erstellt am 2019-12-27 20:24:12

User0815

2019-12-28 14:16:09
  • #1
For my timber frame house, the improvement from 70 to 55 would only have been about 5,000 EUR more expensive.
 

Sternchen31

2019-12-29 17:28:39
  • #2


Yes, we already plan to utilize as much area as possible for photovoltaics. We also want to organize it ourselves and not through the general contractor. We will definitely have an empty conduit installed.
 

Sternchen31

2019-12-29 17:39:24
  • #3


The entire consultation the day before yesterday was more than poor! She immediately rolled her eyes when we mentioned air heat pump and KFW and said why we want to spend so much money unnecessarily. During the calculation came the sentence "I knew it, nearly €20,000 more just for the insulation you need." I then asked more precisely, and it was said the house is built stone by stone and then plastered; insulation will not be applied at all. The difference would amount to €20,000.

But as I said, the whole consultation was very questionable in some respects.
 

Sternchen31

2019-12-29 17:43:27
  • #4


According to the consultant, the insulation in an energy-efficient house would basically just be the brickwork and then the plaster. Nothing else would be insulated at all and since all the insulation material could be saved here, we would have savings of around €20,000. That was never an option for us anyway, so we will stick with KfW55, but she ranted so extremely against KfW55 and also against the air-to-water heat pump that it seemed strange to us anyway.
 

michert

2019-12-29 18:16:37
  • #5
I wouldn't know how you could save €20k from that. The woman would seem suspicious to me.
 

Scout

2019-12-29 18:24:19
  • #6
I strongly suspect that the KfW-70 house is planned monolithically, i.e. without external thermal insulation composite system (ETICS). To reach KfW-55 level, the general contractor can now only offer an insulation facade. So not just a few centimeters more, but wrapping the entire facade specifically for this purpose. That 20k€ is gone very quickly....

Are there also KfW-70 offers with ETICS? The surcharge should rather be 5 to 10k€.

Air-to-water heat pumps are generally more worthwhile the lower the heat demand is.
 

Similar topics
10.12.2009Subsidies for KFW55 and Sole/Water Heat Pump15
12.08.2015Is insulation worth it beyond the new construction standard?34
18.04.2016Air-water heat pump, mechanical ventilation with heat recovery?17
14.09.2018Heating (Heat Pump) Incorrect, heat output too high?14
24.07.2019Energy Saving Ordinance 2016 or KFW 55 for bungalow with air-water heat pump & controlled residential ventilation, optional photovoltaic47
18.12.2019Decision KfW55 vs. KfW40 plus22
05.01.2020Gas vs. Air-Water Heat Pump34
14.12.2020Ice formation brine pipe heat pump78
15.01.2021Is an air-to-water heat pump sensible for renovation as an efficiency house monument (160% Energy Saving Ordinance)?21
19.05.2021Single-family house 140m² KfW efficiency house 55 achievable through insulation and air-to-water heat pump?21
01.06.2021Local heat or air-water heat pump?11
09.07.2021Building according to the Energy Saving Ordinance 2016 or KfW5543
06.11.2021KfW55 EE house with 42.5 Poroton: planned too tight?16
26.03.2022Which is more sensible: heat pump or insulation?33
06.12.2021House construction according to the Building Energy Act still acceptable or better KFW5533
25.01.2022Energy Saving Ordinance Standard or KfW55 (without KfW)17
12.02.2023Hybrid heating: Is a heat pump with a gas condensing boiler sensible in old buildings?26
25.05.2022Air-to-water heat pump + underfloor heating + controlled residential ventilation with heat recovery - individually room differently temperature controllable?10
25.07.2024Make a plan for old building insulation - How to proceed?162
11.09.2024Which heat pump is needed for an old building?11

Oben