Construction costs kfw70 vs. kfw55 vs. kfw40

  • Erstellt am 2016-03-06 20:21:55

jochi79

2016-03-19 20:36:14
  • #1
Hello,

I am currently also in the planning phase, but with a timber frame house with a granny flat, meaning 2 residential units. Standard was offered as KFW55 (air-water heat pump), additional costs for KFW40 €6200 according to the offer with an additional subsidy of €10,000, so I don't need to calculate any further. I will probably even go through with KfW 40 +
 

MarcWen

2016-03-19 20:46:45
  • #2


Can you provide a few more details on how the €6,200 is composed? Thanks.
 

jochi79

2016-03-19 20:57:32
  • #3
As already mentioned, the house is designed as KFW55, anything else no longer makes sense to me. According to my planner, gas would not have made sense here anyway, so it’s air-water heat pump right away (with photovoltaics as KFW40+ in the background, everything somehow fits together). Of course, the question then arose what it takes to go from KFW55 to 40 and also to 40+, according to the offer it is now 3200 for the insulation of the walls and ceiling (flat roof) + 3000 for insulation under the basement floor slab. I should also mention that the final calculation is still missing, but according to the estimate by the energy consultant, it should work out.
 

daniels87

2016-03-19 21:28:16
  • #4
I am currently also waiting for the calculation. However, monolithic (brick)

We only have one residential unit, but would still receive 4500€+8000€ through the 10,000 houses program.
 

elVincent

2016-03-20 08:40:16
  • #5


For us, a 36.5 cm brick with WDZ 0.08 is needed. With that, we achieve a U-value of 0.21 W/m²K. The critical point for us was the basement wall, which we cannot insulate as thickly as we want because of the required bearing area for the 36.5 cm brick (or because we did not want an overhanging edge of insulating material at the ground floor base). Therefore, 12 cm of Styrodur was the maximum here, resulting in a U-value of 0.32 W/m²K. However, we will probably add another 4 cm in the ground, i.e., in a later invisible area, because the basement will be partially occupied and it certainly doesn’t hurt.
 

daniels87

2016-04-08 14:21:18
  • #6
So, we are not doing it now. The thicker wall construction would eat up too much living space, and since the start of construction is already quite close, getting the approval would be too stressful. Otherwise, we would end up with a four-digit amount, from KfW 55 to 40+.
 

Similar topics
10.12.2009Subsidies for KFW55 and Sole/Water Heat Pump15
12.08.2015Is insulation worth it beyond the new construction standard?34
03.07.2016U-value of windows - differences15
25.06.2016How important is the U-value of interior walls?12
13.04.2017U-value of windows: 1.3 - is an upgrade worth it?16
24.04.2017Experiences Single-Family House KfW55 - Assigning Tradesmen Yourself?20
08.03.2018Heating energy demand KfW 55 / KfW 70 and consumption costs10
13.04.2020Project Homeownership - Basement, Ground Floor Plan - Tips76
07.05.2020U-value outer wall 0.26 - is that okay?13
04.03.2019Floor plan design for a new city villa with a basement36
23.05.2019Which stone / brick to use in solid construction33
01.07.2019KFW 55 - Insulation under the floor slab37
24.07.2019Energy Saving Ordinance 2016 or KFW 55 for bungalow with air-water heat pump & controlled residential ventilation, optional photovoltaic47
03.09.2019KFW40(plus) standard multifamily house cannot be achieved40
04.01.2022Air-water heat pump current consumption and data1439
11.12.2020Consultant calculates price for 112m² KFW55 semi-detached house with basement at nearly €600,00032
26.03.2022Which is more sensible: heat pump or insulation?33
22.08.2022Is insulation useful with Poroton bricks?19
02.03.2023Heat pump for KfW55 house 148 sqm99
25.09.2023Statics - house with basement due to insulation, shifting Poroton bricks11

Oben