You are resistant to advice
Or you are unfriendly ;) Sorry, this really is a very informative forum if you get the right people. But what I have partly (so far especially in other threads, now you are also starting here) read in terms of insinuations, generalizations, and sometimes insulting judgments stands in stark contrast to what this forum (in my opinion) should be about.
To the point: Why should I be resistant to advice? If an escape route is feasible there according to the architect, then what is the problem? There are special roof windows that are suitable as escape routes. Why shouldn't you be able to install them in a tent roof with a 30-35 degree pitch?
Advise me, then I won’t be resistant to it. But that requires a bit of information so that your (of course nowhere near as all-knowing as you) counterpart can understand you.
Many questions do not change the facts.
You always start with many questions when you do something for the first time. The real question is rather how these are received or in what environment you can ask them. There are supportive environments... or not. Then answers to questions sound condescending, hardly help, or even fail to appear.
You rightly state that many questions do not change the facts, but that is not the point. The point is not to change the facts, but first to understand them and, if necessary, to look for viable alternatives. If my plans don’t hold, I’m the last one to want to override physical laws. But if they do hold (or problems are solvable), I can also implement them.
For example, my question about the cold roof has so far gone unanswered. Or the one about whether insulation of a tent roof is particularly expensive. Why should I then be resistant to advice if I haven’t yet heard any counterarguments against insulating and finishing a tent roof?
A stack concentration is also already sensible in a two-and-a-half-story single-family house, but even the twenty-first residential unit does not pay for itself yet ;-)
I did not expect such extreme savings either. But I basically have no problem planning that way. If it slightly reduces the costs when laying the pipes (even if only 1-2%), that would already be something.
Is there a thumb rule for what it costs to lay the pipes/connections for kitchen and bathroom to the upper floor if you do it one above the other and if you do it across the house?