Actually divide the property but both have the same building rights

You don't annoy me.

I am glad to hear that. ___________________________________ Probably as a last question on this topic, I need to understand how it could be possible to include the 2 options we currently have as possible subdivision options (after the purchase of plots) in the purchase contract. Is it legally possible to include a site plan with both options (possibly with dimensions) and clearly state that the property will be actually subdivided in this way after the purchase, with the assigned options being preferred? Thanks again for the help so far. Best regards

Is it legally possible to include a site plan with both options (possibly with dimensions) and clearly state that the property will be actually divided in this way after the purchase, with the assigned options being preferred?

If you ignore all warnings and walk down the aisle of the notary with the "partner," a decision should already have been made from the options...

Probably as a last question on this topic, I need to understand how it might be possible to include the 2 options we currently have as possible partition options (after the purchase of properties) in the purchase contract.

... However, I still advise the third option, to send the "partner" away. You probably speak "German as a foreign language," so you might not be able to follow some formulations quickly, but: the core message should still have slowly reached you. It is: separate yourself from this so-called "partner," you are just a useful idiot to him!

As soon as the land division works, I think the big disruptive factor will be out the window (or at least, that's what I hope).

But that is not the case. Semi-detached house partners are, as a court once put it in its reasoning, a long-term community of fate that relies on mutual special consideration. An agreement on the division is easy, the joint construction is difficult, and the hardest is living side by side wall to wall.

I don't think a purchase agreement can be concluded without having finally clarified how the sharing is to be done. How and when is that supposed to be decided otherwise?

I don't think you can conclude a purchase contract without having finally clarified how it is to be divided. How and when else should that be decided?

That is possible, both simply acquire a share, for example 50/50 or 60/40. Then it is a joint ownership in undivided shares and each owns a portion of everything. There will then be additional notary and land registry fees when the actual division takes place.

Ok. But it's annoying if you can't agree already. Then there will be no option to withdraw anymore.