130 sqm detached house or townhouse with my budget of 220k

  • Erstellt am 2016-01-28 13:43:49

Doc.Schnaggls

2016-01-29 08:39:17
  • #1


:

Dear Steffen,

here I want to, no, I must vehemently disagree with you.

A banker who takes his profession seriously does indeed care whether his customer's financing is sensible and sustainable in the long term.

No banker is interested, even out of self-interest, in having to hand over a loan case to the "enforcers." A banker also has a reputation to lose – anyone who consciously advises their clients in such a way that they, to put it bluntly, "fall flat on their face," certainly will not hold their job for long, and rightly so.

The persistent rumor that a bank earns a sack full of money on every foreclosure is unfortunately impossible to kill.

The substantial expenses (in money and in work time) that a bank incurs with a foreclosure are gladly "forgotten."

In many cases, the bank has still lost money even after the foreclosure.

I can assure you that the majority of bankers are still honest and see themselves as partners and advisors of their customers. I see (and verify) this every day in my job.

Of course, there are exceptions in the banking industry, but I believe this is not different in any other industry.

The widespread assumption that every banker automatically becomes a millionaire through commissions and bonuses is complete nonsense. If at all, this only applies to a (very small) part of investment bankers.

Therefore, I am happy to share some insider knowledge here to encourage the discussion participants to think a bit.

After all, not every entrepreneur is a ruthless exploiter and oppressor of people, right? ;)

Best regards,

Dirk
 

Steffen80

2016-01-29 08:50:16
  • #2


You may be right. But based on my experiences in my circle of acquaintances, I am biased. As far as I am concerned, all advisers and bankers can be done away with. Intelligent software does the job much better anyway :) This is currently clearly seen with insurance companies -> see Manager Magazin, topic "Every 4th insurance job is at risk" currently in the press

------------------------

link deleted by moderation; please observe the forum rules.

Thank you very much!
Construction expert
 

T21150

2016-01-29 08:55:56
  • #3


That somehow reassures me!

By the way: My advisor also paid close attention during the home financing (together with me): Not too much! Better smaller and it works.

Best regards
Thorsten
 

Steffen80

2016-01-29 08:56:20
  • #4


The recommendation of a condominium is more aimed at you bringing the partially paid-off condominium as equity into the house. It wouldn't be my case. Basically, you use the condominium as an investment and that represents a huge "concentration risk." Everything has to work out for the calculation to make sense. Location, demand in 5-10 years, and so on...

I would rather pay rent and save on the side. Daily interest/fixed deposit and if you can take some risk, also an ETF (preferably an index fund) savings plan. Whether you pay a few hundred euros per month in interest or rent... There are additional costs with the condominium regarding the move and small things like lamps, windows, etc., which mostly occur twice.

Cheers, Steffen
 

T21150

2016-01-29 08:57:42
  • #5


That is certainly an alternative, which I basically already mentioned yesterday.
 

Bauexperte

2016-01-29 08:59:08
  • #6
Hello,


Crystal ball mode on: "Formats like 'Bauretter & Co.' thrive on the fact that people tend to trust online knowledge rather than a real person" Crystal ball mode off.

Best regards from the Rhineland
 

Similar topics
01.02.2017Build a small house or buy a condo?21
13.11.2018Grandma's house | Right of residence | Rent by oneself15
08.03.2019Elevator next to the condo - operating noises10
07.08.2020Condominium purchase - feasibility study40

Oben