HilfeHilfe
2019-07-09 15:23:27
- #1
then, consistent logic would require explaining to every average earner currently renting centrally in Munich, Hamburg, Stuttgart, Berlin, etc., etc., that their rent payments, considering ongoing rent increases, are harakiri and they should rather move to a cheaper residential area.
A tenant's rent is also a debt to their landlord, lasting their entire lifetime. There is no: I have little money this month and don’t want to pay alternative.
Even in this scenario, there are people who gladly spend 50% of their income for a great loft because it is important to them. €1000 cold rent per month is no longer unusual in normal locations; however, this means owing the landlord €360,000 over the next 30 years. With rent increases, more likely €400,000 or €450,000, which have to be paid every month, otherwise you get evicted. I see no difference compared to buying/building real estate. On the contrary: in 30 years at least I still have something in hand; even if the house may have lost value by then, the rent would be completely gone. Every cent lost. The house stands, and my heirs can sell it.
Even full financing is basically a zero-sum game financially: on one side a debt of amount XY, on the other side an asset of amount XY. The rent debt, however, is a money debt and on the other side only the right to live there. No. I’m done with that.
Sure, but the tenant is more flexible with social changes. Change of residence, employer. No problem at all. A homeowner who has financed too tightly has the bigger problem. And no one is forced to pay expensive rents or prices. I personally also decided to commute. For quality of life reasons.