I find windows or rather the light streaming through them (and sometimes also the view) more beautiful than walls/artificial light, which is why I would always and everywhere vote for as many windows as possible. You can always close a window or limit the view, but adding a window afterwards is more difficult.
Well. I basically understand the approach, but I also know a few houses that didn’t spare any glass, and I wouldn’t want to live in those.
A good, or rather bad example is Mies van der Rohe’s Farnsworth House (if that’s unfamiliar, a quick image search is worth it). Sure, that’s exaggerated. But it illustrates well what I mean:
Quote from Wikipedia by Edith Farnsworth, the resident:
The house is transparent like an X-ray. I wanted something "meaningful," and all I got was this slick subtlety. We know that less is not more. It’s just less. […] The glass-steel construction is uninhabitable. […] Mies talks about open space, but the space is very defined. I can’t even hang a coat hanger in the house without wondering how it changes the view from outside. […] Every rearrangement of furniture becomes a problem.” – Edith Farnsworth
Of course it’s nice to see the surroundings and not feel like you’re in prison in your house. But walls should also provide protection from the outside and keep it at a bit of a distance.
Security and coziness are not created by windows.
I think the classic middle ground is, as so often, a good approach here.
However, in my opinion, the window stinginess in inexpensive buildings is also a plague. But well. Fortunately, everyone can and must decide for themselves what is important to them and what is not.
A reply to the OP: Feel free to leave out the window if the bedroom is only used as a bedroom, that is, for sleeping.
[Update 09:37: Used the wrong quote by mistake]