Ways to fulfill the building obligation/building deadline in order to build later

Who would have thought that a landowner could be happy someday if a rare amphibian species were to settle there as their new home

But honestly, the whole thing is flimsy times ten. Give it back.

don't ask me why I don't want to start yet or why I would be willing to throw up to 20,000 euros away.

Yes, because that would be the only interesting thing in the thread.

It really makes a huge difference whether the OP here might have gotten into a difficult situation through no fault of their own and now stands with bound hands and back against the wall, having to watch the dream of the house go down the drain because of a formality, OR, because... well, my predecessors have already written enough about it... "Cognac"

It simply makes a huge difference whether the OP here has possibly ended up in a difficult situation through no fault of their own and now stands with their hands tied and backed against the wall, having to watch how the dream of the house goes down the drain because of a formality, OR, because... well

The users of this forum apparently do not know any way to avoid the construction obligation for 20,000 euros. The OP's motivation is completely irrelevant.

There is always a way and 20T is at least a start. For example, as a donation for the organization of the next celebration - Stadtfest/Dorffest or as a donation to the Heimatverein, whose chairman happens to be the responsible head of the construction department.

Somehow fulfill the requirement of the residential building shell cheaply. Maybe put a "cheap" tiny house (mini house) as a shell on the plot? It would then be demolished or sold when the actual single-family house construction starts later.

A mini or tiny house probably does not comply with the development plan. Therefore, no.

It simply makes a huge difference whether the OP has possibly unknowingly gotten into a difficult situation here and now stands with tied hands and backed against the wall, watching the dream of the house go down the drain because of a formality, OR because... well, my predecessors have already written enough about that... "Cognac"

Down the drain... no, no. He can then be glad that he is allowed to return the plot. Then someone else can be happy who is better off financially or in partnership. Because there are plenty who need it, are financially able, but do not have a plot. And that is selfish: simply sitting on it until a better phase of life comes again. Fate just does not want it that way, it wants it differently with the OP, and sometimes you have to step back proudly. @OP If it is as I think, I would build a fairly simple standard house on it and initially not develop the upper floor. That is financially manageable, you avoid unnecessary costs like finishing the bathroom, and you have a ready-to-move-in apartment on the ground floor for one (or two) person(s). Later then you can do nest building with garden and upper floor development. You are not throwing money away, and everything is legitimate.

Hello everyone,

thank you very much for the numerous and quick responses.

----
Briefly off-topic:

In my initial post, I tried to describe my situation as generally as possible with as many details as necessary in order to receive suggestions that might help me and perhaps also other readers find alternative solutions.
According to the majority of the responses, this apparently did not succeed. Next time, I will have to formulate my posts better to prevent speculation about my situation from the outset, so you have the opportunity to respond to these posts without bias.
Whether it is believed or not (which is not the topic of my question). I will build on the plot.
However, since I have already realized, based on offers from construction companies, that they are very busy (very long delivery times), and in my opinion the price/performance ratio is no longer adequate, I need more time to make the right decisions for me.
If I am already investing so much money in such a financially costly project, then I definitely do not want to be under time pressure and make any rash decisions just to meet the requirements of the municipality, from which I also did not get the plot cheaper (no local resident model).
If, however, this is demanded from me, I have to consider "unusual" alternatives because I will not return the plot voluntarily. Since I have already invested several thousand euros in the plot (real estate transfer tax, notary fees, property tax, construction ground survey, etc.), which I would have to pay again if I returned it to the municipality.
But as already mentioned, all this has nothing to do with the actual subject because everyone would decide differently in such a situation - even if my decision should be antisocial and morally questionable.
I am currently weighing things up and just want to be on the safe side in keeping the plot. Because if one trade for the shell construction takes longer than planned (which currently is not so unlikely), I would at least according to my purchase contract be in trouble and would have to renegotiate with the municipality and hope for understanding.
Therefore, my question to you.
----

you could offer the municipality, in return for loosening the building obligation, to accept a longer repurchase right in case of resale. For the public sector, there is a maximum limit of 30 years.

Thank you for your suggestion.
But wouldn't that be the same as an application for an extension of the building deadline, which I have already submitted?
The repurchase right includes that the municipality gets something back if, for example, requirements are not met; extending this would also extend the building deadline.

For example, as a donation for hosting the next celebration - city festival/village festival or as a donation for the local heritage association, whose chairperson happens to be the responsible official of the building authority.

Also a good suggestion, but unfortunately I would not have written security and would be dependent on the mood of the community members.

- You also need a building permit or exemption approval for a tiny house. Since the municipality/building authority is not stupid or easily fooled, you will not get permission for this. They will know exactly that you only want to force a delay with it.

Mini or tiny houses probably do not comply with the development plan. Therefore, no.

Thank you for your explanations.
I want and must comply with all legal requirements, which also includes a building permit for a tiny house or mini house, I know that.
Could you please explain to me how the municipality can refuse such a construction project?
In my opinion, the municipality must also comply with regulations and cannot simply say "this is not approved" arbitrarily.
If I comply with the development plan (which only has maximum specifications) and there is no local design statute for this building area, and I submit a plan from the draftsman including structural analysis, energy saving regulations, etc., then the municipality could only say, "doesn't work because e.g., not in the building zone, or roof too steep." But not: "doesn't work because the house is too small or they might want to speculate"?

Whether 20,000 euros would be enough for that is of course another matter, that's true, I would have to weigh that again.

Regards

Jan