Ways to fulfill the building obligation/building deadline in order to build later

  • Erstellt am 2019-10-15 22:14:44

11ant

2019-10-18 16:52:26
  • #1
How many years would you approximately need to realize that a tiny house plus demolition, disposal, and full depreciation (even without on top the road damage caused by your construction vehicles as latecomers) is more expensive than the current delta between the actual and desired conditions of the construction offers?
 

Michlhausbauaa

2019-10-19 16:17:49
  • #2
Give it back - there has been enough time!
 

hollowback

2019-10-22 11:33:20
  • #3
Hello,
thank you for the additional contributions!



Good tip, which I can definitely make use of. Thank you very much!

I will most likely not build a tiny house, although it would basically be possible (for other interested parties who also want to use it later). It just requires some negotiation skills and careful reading and adherence to the regulations of the communities to meet the expectations of both parties. Anyone who reads up on this topic will notice that it is another trend in response to, for example, rising construction costs.

I will definitely proceed with my further planning, get offers, and start building. Should the construction time be extended for unforeseen reasons, I can use one or another recommendation from this thread.

Thank you very much!

Regards
Jan
 

Mottenhausen

2019-10-22 13:17:30
  • #4


With all due respect, if there really is a completely absurd "trend" to circumvent the building obligation with tiny homes, this will be taken into account in the corresponding regulations in the future.

The building obligation is not only meant to prevent speculation but also to contribute to creating housing that is often lacking in many places. A 15sqm wooden shack definitely does not fulfill this.

What you write is conceptually questionable anyway. Tiny houses are not free, and if building becomes more and more expensive, it is pointless to...
1. waste a lot of money on an outbuilding
2. wait even longer
3. A tiny house replaces living space for one person, not for a multi-person family; they would then have to build several tiny houses, which would again be more expensive than a traditional house since each time you need separate heating & electrical installations, or how do you imagine that?
 

Tassimat

2019-10-22 14:13:55
  • #5


Nice that you have put the nonsense about the tiny house behind you and are starting to build properly. This way you are safe and on the right track. Still, a supplement about the tiny house, because even if in theory a tiny house is allowed, the project will quickly fail in practice. Either due to the development plan or due to §34 of the Building Code:



In the end, you depend on the goodwill of numerous caseworkers.
 

11ant

2019-10-22 16:42:34
  • #6


More strict measures are already being taken to ensure that holiday homes do not become permanent residences. I do not see a trend to bypass building obligations through tiny houses, nor is this claimed by the original poster. However, there is a growing number of people with the crazy idea that building land should be designated for brick-built sleeping bags – but (beyond the parking spaces of replacement villas) slums are not in the interest of urban development authorities.
 

Similar topics
27.08.2014Planning living space & kitchen of a semi-detached house in Nuremberg13
19.10.2018Use lime, cement plaster, or gypsum plaster in the living area?22
16.05.2021Raise the living room floor level24
22.01.2022How much living space? How many floors? Holiday home in a special zone11
17.07.2022Floor plan: Door planning living room + pantry17
28.09.2022Screed execution in the attic - ceiling between the attic and living space16

Oben