Walls with FBR Robot Hadrian X

...
I think robots/technology can already provide support there.
...

Of course, my above - and possibly subsequent - posts are formulated in an exaggerated way. It really depends on how the technology is used. Numerous examples show that it by far does not always contribute to the welfare of humanity.

Bricklayers have a bad image. Masonry technicians who are responsible for ensuring that the robot works and is programmed correctly are regarded much more highly.
...

Is that why household support is no longer called a cleaning lady, but a cleaning specialist, because she can handle the comple(x) technology of the household?

...
Nursing has so many tasks that are difficult and time-consuming for interpersonal matters.
...

In my opinion, nursing should always be interpersonal.

To cut the discussion short: I understand what you want to say. What I want to say and what has already said is: It’s not the technology that’s the problem, but what people do with it. One approach is now to ban the technology, and if the potential damage is great enough I also find that reasonable (but I don’t see that with construction or care robots), but the better approach would be to develop further as humans and as a society. As rightly pointed out, the fact that old or sick people are left alone has nothing to do with care not being provided. I am even rather convinced of the opposite. People who have an interest in their parents and grandparents are relieved and so the time spent together can even be used better. Yes, and if there are families who neglect their elderly, then it would be better if the hard work is done by a robot so that the "emotional" work can then be done by a person specially trained for that.

Is the household support no longer called a cleaner but rather a cleaning specialist because they can handle the comple(re)x technology of the household?

With the designation, the job profile must change, otherwise everything stays the same.

... People who have an interest in their parents and grandparents are relieved, and the time spent together can even be used better. ...

There are also families where the children are cared for around the clock by a – hopefully still human – nanny. The parents then take them in for occasional one-on-one time and give them back for the rest of the time. But sure... an endless discussion. And yes: I understand the basic idea/approach :) You just mustn’t lose sight of setting boundaries. So far, I have nothing against technology and robots that help in the household or garden. But one should be careful when it comes to interpersonal matters. I already notice that when I have to “navigate” through automated phone menus or “chat” with a chatbot at Amazon. It’s all too easy to only see the “advantages.” Children are reachable and controllable, etc. But the numerous problems that come with mobile phones for children are obviously not perceived or just accepted as “that’s how it is.”

Yes exactly, the problem doesn’t only arise with the robot, but people who are just the way you mean (and who can afford it) already behave the way you consider unfortunate today. An affordable robot could of course increase the quantity of such cases, but that doesn’t change the quality. And I’m not even so sure that it’s that bad if such people are no longer forced to deal with the respective unpleasant tasks. And conversely, it would then be possible for people who like to be social to take care of the “left alone” people because they don’t have to do physical labor. At the moment, however, I unfortunately don’t see our society at a level where this is collectively supported (especially financially).

This already exists, as I saw yesterday. When I followed Hadrian X on YouTube, more videos were offered to me afterwards: they showed houses being printed with concrete as if it were buttercream, and instead of welding, gaps were left.

I have been following the topic for several years. Printing entire houses is still in its infancy.

But such a masonry robot would already have its justification. On the European market more than in AUS. Especially since the use of larger stone formats in the future can make building more efficient.

The price of the robot at 2 million is certainly nothing for small companies that build the majority of single-family houses, semi-detached houses, and terraced houses in DE.

For the large companies, however, the masonry robot promises more flexibility, and such an investment is also more far-sighted there.