Walls with FBR Robot Hadrian X

I didn't mean that...
To make it short: Both my mother (10 years ago) and my father (2 years ago) died at home after a long illness, and my sister and I were there. This was possible because of family cohesion. We accordingly reduced our working hours to be there for our parents.

I never claimed that technology cannot be supportive. Without the appropriate technology, for example, there would be no intensive care as we know it. Nevertheless, in my opinion, interpersonal interaction must not be replaced by too much technology.

Why am I being accused here of having hardly any knowledge about the topic? We don't even know each other that well...
———-

But this is about bricklaying robots here. So I will end the off-topic.

Because you are spouting barroom slogans that sound like the stories of companions (relatives) without having looked behind the scenes.

Not everything will ever be managed only by robots. But facilitating work in, for example, basic care must be managed electrically/by robots. In the future, therefore, it will be a cooperation between robots and real humans. The alternative would be more deaths/underserved patients because there are not enough skilled workers.

In the future, there will be a collaboration between robots and real humans.

And it is already the present that humans and machines work together with robot intelligence. The better this works, the less we notice it. A car with parking assistance or adaptive cruise control already has robotics on board. An automated container port has already become normal for us. Agricultural machines operate with centimeter accuracy using GPS-supported sensors; the machine operator is sometimes only on board for legal reasons.
In construction and other industries with less structured and controllable environments, automation is accelerating with the decreasing cost of precise sensors. I find it exciting and more opportunity-opening than harmful. There are risks with every development. The risk of stagnation is significantly higher.

Overlap dimensions must be observed, that is the bricklayer's responsibility, yes - botched pockets, on the other hand, are usually messed up at the planning level: namely, when the planner deviates from the standard measurement in a way that cannot be remedied by stone cutting (or again only at the expense of violating overlap dimensions). One aspect, by the way – to get back to the topic – that does not affect the concrete cream pressure robot, but unfortunately affects the stone-setting robot to the same extent as the inexperienced bricklayer or his stand-in for illness, the libero subcontractor :)

That is exactly where I see the advantage: Because of the brick-precise planning, there are simply no more botched pockets.

Exactly there I see the advantage, due to brick-precise planning there are simply no more botch pockets.

Collaboration is similar, for example, in automobile manufacturing. Welding and cutting work is carried out much faster and more precisely – and also without fatigue. However, almost every construction site is different. However: (still) every robot is only as ‚smart‘ as the human ‚behind‘ it.

That's exactly where I see the advantage: thanks to brick-precise planning, there are simply no more botched patches.

Advantage of whom or what? - Avoiding botched patches in planning does not require any complicated high-tech algorithms that only a robot brain could remember: dividing every meter into eight equal steps should be possible even for a special needs student, so an ordinary Homo sapiens 1.0 without any advanced high definition plugin like a diploma or something ;-)

In Beckum, the First House (bei uns) from the 3-printer has been completed