wieli
2017-10-31 15:12:33
- #1
The reaction speed is higher with tiles than with laminate, that is correct. The storage capacity of the tile is also better. But: The heating period is significantly extended. In the transitional seasons, when I still don’t have cold feet with laminate/parquet/vinyl, your discomfort with tiles will certainly drive you to the thermostat to turn on the heating... I think this negates the advantage mentioned earlier.It heats up faster and retains heat longer, which is also more economical in terms of consumption.
How big is the difference if the laminate is glued down? (Can a layman handle gluing it, I have only installed it normally so far).
A full-surface gluing usually does not occur, as 99% of laminate manufacturers prohibit it. Cost-wise, it would also be a disaster. The adhesive would probably be more expensive than the laminate.
An underlay with very good conductivity is important. A thermal resistance of 0.01 m2K/W or even less is ideal. The additional costs pay off quickly. Conventional cork or foam has 4-5 times the insulation value! And of course, don’t forget the vapor barrier if it is not already integrated in the underlay.