pagoni2020
2020-10-24 13:00:57
- #1
I understand what you mean, but for me personally, only a deal where I am treated on equal footing and fairly is an option. That’s why some deals didn’t work out for me, which was also okay. Recently, we withdrew from a project because the real estate agent, in my opinion, wanted to make a fool of us. We simply said/wrote no, and suddenly everything and more was possible than ever before. But since we had said no, we stuck to it, and then he got offended. I have to say that I don’t like to “fall in love” with something I don’t yet own when it comes to deals, because that has – unfortunately already happened – sometimes caused me to do stupid things. I don’t believe there is ONE reality; but rather probabilities and individual experiences. Therefore, you often only know in hindsight what would have been “right,” and what was right with one agent/business partner can be wrong with the next. I also wouldn’t understand why I can’t immediately and mutually bindingly accept an offer (if it’s published as an offer) from MY side. If it is clearly more like an auction, you of course have to be prepared for that. Nevertheless, I maintain that I would always be focused on clarity and bindingness. The OP does not feel good about it, so they should also consider how far that is still acceptable to them. In any case, I would personally advocate for clarity/bindingness or at least politely demand it. The agent can also clearly tell me that the highest bidder wins; that can be said clearly too, and I can prepare myself for it; only gibberish I find inappropriate.What @pagoni2020 writes sounds good. Unfortunately, it completely misses reality. Such behavior is usually not affordable because then you’re immediately out.