Specification of solid construction in the exposé is not correct - experiences

Loam and half-timbered construction should also be considered solid, right?

One can debate that wonderfully. Solid construction can be defined, among other things, as having no separation between load-bearing and room-enclosing functions, meaning the load-bearing structure and room enclosure are one component. This could possibly apply to half-timbered construction, if it weren't for the skeleton construction, where the load transfer occurs via posts whose panels may not be load-bearing at all. The whole thing is not entirely clear. One can especially have a lively debate about this in court.

One can wonderfully argue about that. Massive construction can be defined, among other things, as having no separation between the load-bearing and room-enclosing functions, meaning the load-bearing structure and room enclosure as one component. This could possibly apply to the timber frame construction, if it weren't for the skeletal structure, where the load transfer occurs via supports, and the panels might not be load-bearing at all. It's not entirely clear. One can especially argue well about this in court.

I read the same on Wiki. For me, it was then clear that it is not massive construction because of the panels between the load-bearing elements.

And the purchase contract?

Why is the renovation becoming significantly more expensive? You need a drywall partition inside anyway, otherwise everything is crooked and uneven...

We bought our property back then according to the exposé with the features:

- all utilities are connected
- building plot is immediately available

This was also confirmed to me again when I inquired with the realtor. All utilities are connected...

Before construction began, the municipal utilities contacted us to explain that the plot was not yet developed. The utilities are all in the street or on the other side of the street...

There was then a meeting between the municipal utilities, the realtor (who was also responsible for the development of the new residential area), and me. No one could remember why this plot was not developed.

"But actually the utilities are connected... they are in the street that runs past the house," I was told.

I was then stuck with the costs of the subsequent development because the exposé and some terms are quite "flexible." See also [Massivhaus]...

What does the purchase contract say? Maybe "bought as seen," like with cars? I am not familiar with purchase contracts for existing properties but I guess there are specifications about the house in it or the purchase contract overrides the exposé. Clay and half-timbered must also be solid construction, right?

Usually only the "parcel with the existing building"

An exposé is an advertising tool. Nothing more. When you buy something, you have to check it yourself (or have it checked), for example by an expert.
A house only 20 years old requires less inspection, an older house should be checked thoroughly, for example whether there is pest infestation or mold, because usually it is the foundation or the roof truss that is affected.

And if you exclude something for yourself, i.e., something you do not want to buy yourself, you have to check it.
And a broker is just a mediator who wants to bring the property to another owner.

Is there a 14-day return policy from the notary contract? Can this be called suspicion here?