Shower easy to care for and still beautiful

So, I have already had various length and width solutions, but I consider those 70cm from your initial picture to be rather impractical. Of course, "anything" is always possible and it depends especially on your showering habits, but 70cm length and then only a 50cm passage I would rather see as an emergency solution. Whether this "justifies" building a bidet when it would practically prevent comfortable showering....? There are also 140cm bathtubs........but whether I want that....?

So, I have thought it over now and also asked someone who has a 140 shower with an 80 fixed panel and a 60 passage in the niche. It does spray a bit out, but not severely. And a 140 shower would also still be possible for us. Between the shower and bathtub there would then be 170 cm, which is more than enough for a toilet and bidet.

Would that then be better?

One can certainly debate what "a few single drops" are, but 40 or even 45 centimeters less should drastically change the result.

Yes, that is my question whether it splashes more forward or to the side. If it only splashes forward, then that is not a problem since there is still a wall in front.

It sprays in almost all directions, and quite a bit will also get outside. You’re not standing flat against the wall while showering but will probably be about 50 cm away from it. Now the water hits your head at about ~180 cm height and effortlessly flies the missing 20 or more centimeters toward the exit. If it still has to be that way, I would go for at least 90 cm plus 50 cm passage. You can easily get in there unless you look like Reiner Calmund at his best times.

So I thought about it and also asked someone who has a 140 shower with an 80 fixed panel and a 60 passage in the niche. It does splash out a bit, but not significantly. And a 140 shower would still fit with us. Between the shower and the bathtub there would be 170 cm left and that is more than enough for a toilet and bidet.
Would that be better then?

Who can really tell you honestly that they might have chosen a stupid solution for themselves??
I posted a drawing for you and there the fixed panel was 100 cm long, 60 passage and a wall at the end. Of course that worked and it was no problem. But with 80 cm and in a new building that would be only an emergency solution for me. I did it that way back then when I converted one large bathroom into two smaller ones, so a renovation of an existing building.
Then I would rather take a 90x90 cabin, to be honest.

there are glass stabilizers that are mounted from the ceiling instead of on the side of the wall like yours. It looks better visually. I have a 140cm Duscholux Air2. It doesn't need a stabilizer anyway!

I've never heard of anyone removing the tiles either. I just quickly rinse them with the handheld shower because of shower gel and shampoo residue. That's completely sufficient. The shower wall measuring 140x220 takes exactly 30 seconds to be wiped down from top to bottom (I am very thorough). Half wall, half glass certainly means more cleaning effort than a continuous glass wall!

By the way, I have a total length of 210cm. 140 glass wall, 70 passage. At the back end there is a towel dryer. It has never gotten wet. Even when my wife waves the handheld shower around.

I clean the (white) tiled walls at most once a year (it may be that my wife cleans them in between without asking me). I am amazed at how many people consider cleaning a large glass pane—which actually looks good and also has lighting advantages—as "normal" and "quickly done." With this knowledge, I enjoy even more simply "stepping out" of my shower—without any additional cleaning activities (a "walkout shower," of course).