Savings beginner with questions about the plausibility of the "rough" plan

  • Erstellt am 2015-12-27 15:23:07

Vanben

2016-03-09 23:55:29
  • #1
As long as only one partner in a marriage is working, they can use the tax allowance of the non-working partner. The higher the marginal tax rate of the working partner, the greater the resulting relief - in extreme cases ~45% of the current allowance.

A second income therefore only actually brings more money into the household budget if it significantly exceeds the savings that are now lost from the first income.
 

Bieber0815

2016-03-10 07:45:53
  • #2
Ah, okay, I understand! (Grundfreibetrag derzeit 8.652 €/a, 45 % davon sind 3893,40 €/a oder 324 €/Monat. ... Aus meiner Sicht praktisch nicht relevant, da dürften die hier diskutierten Fälle drüber liegen. Danke für die Erläuterung!)
 

willo7777

2016-03-10 07:49:57
  • #3
That is not correct. Both allowances are always applied to the total income. In your example, the second income would effectively pay 45% tax, no matter how high it is. The tax classes also do not play a role in the annual consideration.
 

Musketier

2016-03-10 07:59:06
  • #4
I agree with Willo7777. Only the second Arbeitnehmerpauschbetrag of €1000 is lost. In return, a minor (flat-taxed) job could turn the whole calculation upside down. It is indeed the case that the taxpayer with €100K income + approx. €5K flat-taxed job of the spouse is better off than the couple with 2x €52.5K.
 

Steffen80

2016-03-10 08:09:20
  • #5
Very interesting regarding splitting. Luckily, we have a tax office that deals with this for a lot of money. On the topic "wife goes to work or stays at home," here is another aspect: My wife earns per year (30h per week) what I make in a month. She has a net income of about 1300 EUR per month. We pay almost 800 EUR per month for the daycare and my wife needs a car for work. I estimate that at around 300 EUR per month. Why do you think she goes to work? Because of the money?

Money isn’t everything and the women in the "Osten" might think a bit differently than those in the "West."

Regards, Steffen
 

Bieber0815

2016-03-10 10:13:38
  • #6
Good that my understanding of splitting has now been straightened out again. Somehow I found the argument convincing ... for whatever reason. Still, thanks for _all_ contributions on the topic.
 

Similar topics
08.07.2013Does the repayment fit the income? - Is financing feasible this way?14
02.09.2013Loan of EUR 500,000 - possible with monthly income?17
15.11.2013Is financing with this income realistic? Experiences?11
21.01.2015Which credit burden suits which income - experiences?22
28.03.2015Is income for full financing possible or not?26
03.11.2015House construction for €750,000 with an income57
15.05.2016Own home - Planning the property / Financing with income ok?22
20.06.2016Experiences with income from self-employed individuals in financing?12
29.08.2016Can we afford this? Income / Investment / Equity131
17.04.2017Is land and house construction possible with our income?43
02.02.2018Financing strategy - increase income by payment of 3?18
22.04.2019Real estate loan with high collateral but low ongoing income35
02.05.2019Is buying a house at all possible with our income?49
16.10.2019Is building a house possible with our income?88
10.01.2020How much income do we need for our home loan?38
16.03.2020Small income - house construction, rental, and co10
04.06.2020Maximum construction financing based on income63
23.12.2020Construction financing, assessment possible with income?11
06.05.2024Financial planning for new construction with good income and little equity81

Oben