ypg
2019-11-08 09:26:53
- #1
inform yourself about what the acceptance legally means. On the one hand, it is not considered automatically accepted if you already have the painter in, when this [EL] has been agreed with the [GU]. It is not the case that an [EL] automatically means acceptance. However, lack of or incorrect communication can lead to this.
The acceptance is a fixed procedure. Defects found are listed there, including those you do not see now, but only during the inspection. Now it may be that you still have the plaster problem, but I agree with : you should also bear the costs, since you did not like the look. You signed the plan in the building application. Changes just cost.
If you think that any defect should prevent you from accepting the house, then you will only move in in summer 2020. That is not how it works. The list of defects is, as said, drawn up with a deadline and signed. It is part of the house construction and should then be dealt with quickly.
That’s right.
That’s how I see it, too. It is a [GU]-house. He has his tasks to fulfill, but so does the builder.
The acceptance is a fixed procedure. Defects found are listed there, including those you do not see now, but only during the inspection. Now it may be that you still have the plaster problem, but I agree with : you should also bear the costs, since you did not like the look. You signed the plan in the building application. Changes just cost.
I think I am rather in the better position and do not have to be pressured into accepting the house.
If you think that any defect should prevent you from accepting the house, then you will only move in in summer 2020. That is not how it works. The list of defects is, as said, drawn up with a deadline and signed. It is part of the house construction and should then be dealt with quickly.
So just stay a bit more relaxed and don’t only see black and white. Stubborn mode won’t get you to finish a house.
That’s right.
Well, I can understand that the plasterers don’t want to change anything for free. They have apparently completed their task fully. The [GU] would then have to agree with the window fitter whether he will (at least partially) cover the costs for the plasterers or possibly pass the costs on to you if it can be interpreted that you didn’t inform in advance about the presence or absence of the corresponding interior window sills. I don’t know what is considered standard or not. As a plasterer, I certainly wouldn’t do anything at my own expense.
That’s how I see it, too. It is a [GU]-house. He has his tasks to fulfill, but so does the builder.