Facade defect: mortar residues and smears - defect or not?

  • Erstellt am 2017-11-03 19:26:30

winnetou78

2017-11-03 20:42:15
  • #1
I'll put it this way, with a normal joint smoothing, you would have noticed edges everywhere on the bricks. And honestly, now it's too late anyway. If they cut out the joints again, you don't want that mess. And as for the dirt, it doesn't look that bad here on the phone. But as I said, acid washing doesn't really work properly on these rough stones anyway.
 

Guschi

2017-11-03 21:00:44
  • #2
Correct, etching is also prohibited. It may not look "tragic" in the photo, but when you stand in front of the facade, it appears poorly finished.

I have edges in this form everywhere as well, but as already mentioned, the damage is done.

Here is another picture again. I can't imagine having to get by with this.
 

manyyuu

2017-11-03 21:31:44
  • #3
I can understand the frustration... even if a third party might think someone is making too much of it, as the client you naturally take it seriously and expect (rightly) that work is not or was not done carelessly. I find it difficult to judge whether the dirt is still within the tolerance range or already constitutes a defect, and I estimate that even experts would not all answer this question the same way (especially in such cases there is always a subjective component). But would there be anything against initially claiming it as a defect during acceptance and seeing if the general contractor is reasonable and willing to make a concession? By the way, I find the stone incredibly great, may I ask what kind it is?
 

Guschi

2017-11-03 21:57:03
  • #4
The main contractor has already twice reluctantly tried to make improvements. I will, of course, declare it as a defect again during the building acceptance. If necessary, an expert must then intervene as a mediation body if no agreement is reached. Financial compensation would not be an optimal solution for me either, as I will be looking after it for the lifetime of the building owner.

Of course, the stone comes from Röben. Sand yellow multicolored!
 

manyyuu

2017-11-03 22:03:19
  • #5
Hm, then we should perhaps reconsider the Lehm-bunt from Röben after all :). But would a rework even be feasible (that is, without having to replace the entire facade)? I thought the only option left would be financial compensation, since the possibilities are exhausted...
 

Guschi

2017-11-03 22:19:41
  • #6
According to the opinion of our GU and the companies Röben and Quickmix, it should be possible to brush it off, but so far this has not been successful, unfortunately. The next question would then be what amount of compensation we are talking about. This too can only be clarified by an expert. We will probably have to take this detour, as we do not assume that our construction company is willing to make further efforts.
 

Similar topics
10.05.2015Screed uneven - defect removal refused52
26.03.2016Garage base draws water - defect?28
07.04.2016Defect?? Glued engineered parquet doesn’t stick everywhere?!11
30.10.2016Construction delay -> Compensation?30
16.03.2021Ventilated, suspended facade instead of ETICS?29
22.01.2017Single-skin vs. double-skin facade23
24.05.2017Gray spots on the originally white facade17
04.04.2017Which facade is better?33
16.07.2017Empty facade, highlight32
12.09.2017Roof constructed too flat - Construction company does not acknowledge the defect12
13.11.2017Facade according to DIN18202 flawless41
21.09.2018Has adhesive been pushed out between the window panes - defect?27
16.02.2019Manufacturing S-shaped facade - construction method22
21.08.2019Cost of clinker brick veneer facade?18
24.01.2020Drainage in front of garage door is missing / correct it? Defect?15
19.05.2021Substructure facade rhombus battens without insulation19
16.08.2020Bathtub misaligned - defect?15
29.01.2021Should the awning maker make corrections here? - Is this a defect?11
06.05.2021Brickwork sealing not compliant with standards, minor defect10
16.05.2021Handle position on the window not centered - defect?51

Oben