Positioning of the house on a small plot (again)

"If the remaining waste bin area after a reduction of the storage area is sufficient for the required number of waste bins, you are welcome to enter into negotiations with the co-owners about a proportional purchase. The city is no longer the owner of the parcel and basically has no objections to your project." Just came in.

Very unbureaucratic and accommodating. What do you want to use the piece of "edge area" for then?

I have to emphasize it again. It is quite astonishing how easily laws can be circumvented. References are made to legal texts at two different points in the development plan, but later no one cares.

The municipalities often want to sell problem properties as well.

Here, for example, you have some properties that were sold, but the building obligation is not being met. One is now built on. Everything is contrary to the development plan. Semi-detached house (3 residential units) on a single-family house plot. 2 full floors even though that was never allowed. A lot is going on there by now.

I have to harp on this once again. It is really very surprising how easily laws can be circumvented. Two different places in the development plan refer to legal texts, but later no one cares.

Which law did the development plan cite as justification for the garbage bin waiting area?

Municipalities often also want to sell problem properties.

By shifting the problem to a diagonally opposite property? At least they handled the space there in a building setback and did not reduce its building envelope by having to notch it out for that. The mayor of Schilda from would have managed to set a separate boundary distance behind the garbage bins.

Which law did the development plan quote as justification for the garbage bin pickup waiting area?

This is illustrated in my post #28. I no longer open readable documents. I find the discussion about the house location more than pointless.

I have to stomp on this once more. It is really quite surprising how easily laws can be circumvented. Two different places in the development plan refer to legal texts, but later no one cares.

Why? It is wonderful when reason triumphs over pedantry. When an employee at the building authority says, "If 5 m² is enough for the garbage bins, you can gladly use the remaining 25 for your garden," instead of insisting on the blue appendix to the yellow application of the red form for applying for the pink certificate of good conduct, with which you can then apply for the green ID...

This is illustrated in my post #28.

I consider the mentioned regulation merely as a legal basis for the recommendation of such an area, but not as a mandatory requirement. In this context, the reasoning is mentioned that the garbage trucks will not enter the quasi-dead-end "Planstraße B".