Partially change or revoke the right of way

When I turn on Slayer, you can't hear anything at all in the north wing. You're doing something wrong.

When I play Slayer, you can't hear anything in the north wing at all. You're doing something wrong.

If you mean me, we don't have a north wing. We only have an east/south/west/north wing each on the ground floor and upper floor. There wasn't enough money for separate wings in every cardinal direction. To be honest, I would also find a house in the shape of a cross rather unattractive.

Hello, I just skimmed the topic. It would be good if you really post the text of the regulation. Let's see what is actually regulated there...

Bad luck, I would say. The notary advised you poorly. ... and you can be angry at the notary who did not advise you properly. But there is probably nothing more you can do.

The notary has a duty of neutrality, meaning he is NOT the representative of one party's interests. Notaries are, according to the Notary Act, independent and impartial supervisors of the parties involved. And the maintenance and upkeep of the path is presumably also regulated in the notary contract, usually based on the proportional sizes of the properties unless the parties agree otherwise. Furthermore, the right of way can be divided into pedestrian, driving, and utility rights. Here, the driving right should have been regulated differently in the seller’s interest.

I also like the idea of selling the path; it’s a dead issue anyway. However, it seems to be a psychological problem for most sellers—they want to retain control over the path. But if the right of way is not regulated to their advantage, the exact opposite happens. They remain responsible for the costs and duties but have little control. There are also exemplary calculations available online showing how a right of way affects the market value of the servient and dominant properties. Conclusion: The seller burdened with the registered encumbrance (right of way) suffers a loss in value, while the buyer and user of the right of way gains an increase in value.

The notary has a duty of neutrality, i.e. he is NOT the representative of the interests of one party. Notaries are independent and impartial advisors to the parties according to the Notary Act. And the notarial contract probably also regulates the maintenance and care of the path, which is usually based on the proportional sizes of the properties unless the parties agree otherwise. Furthermore, the right of way can be divided into a right of passage on foot, by vehicle, and for utilities. Here, the right of passage by vehicle would have had to be regulated differently in favor of the seller.

I also like the idea of selling the path, but that is a closed chapter. It seems to be a psychological problem for most sellers; they want to keep control over the path. Only if the right of way is not regulated in their favor does exactly the opposite happen. They end up bearing the costs and obligations, but have little control. There are exemplary calculations online showing how a right of way changes the market value of the dominant property and the servient property. Conclusion: The seller with the registered encumbrance (right of way) suffers a depreciation, while the buyer and user of the right of way gains an appreciation.

That is how it is. That is exactly what we have here ourselves. You just have to make the best of it.

I regularly get told off for it because the two of them are just standing in bed at that time. ;)

Well, if they are allowed to do something now and then that you don’t like ;-) ... but don’t say "constantly" now. ;-)