Online apartment sale, what can be shared

There is no need to artificially create a problem where there is none. Inform the sender that the name is on it and that says it all. I would never think of making a mountain out of a molehill in the forum over something like this.

I don't think the OP actually wants that. She is just surprised and probably feels a bit involved because of the personal connection.

It is about a condominium that is listed for sale on online portals and is known to me. All documents were sent to me by email, including the latest statement of the homeowners' association.
It also includes the name and address of the owner who apparently last rented out the said apartment.
Is it common practice that this personal information may be sent to every interested party upon first contact (email)?

Common it may be, allowed I doubt (here I give my two cents as a non-moderator).

The seller normally agrees in the broker contract that ALL information about the property may be forwarded.

The seller yes, but not effectively also for third parties. And even consents that do exist, but were given "before the GDPR," I would regard with caution.

And of course the protocols are accessible with real names.

Inspection and the issuance of copies are not the same. Against the background of data protection, I would consider it appropriate that a notary inspects the documents in the concrete sales case, but the broker issues copies with personal data redacted.

ypg, you have to add your two cents to everything or are you the moderator here?

Why not?

If the broker receives the documents unredacted from the owner, why shouldn't he distribute them then? I have also often received documents with the owner’s data, at the latest the owner is recorded in the land register (and often also the previous owner).

Completely normal. And if the saleswoman has no problem with it…… so what?

If the broker receives the documents unredacted from the owner, why shouldn’t he distribute them then.

Judge, I did not start the data protection violation, I only continued it ???