New construction single - Civil servant permanent service realistic?

After 99 years, if the church does not want to extend, it would have had to declare repossession and compensate at market value. Unlikely, rather it would have re-leased, what does it want with the hut. The great thing about this model, however, is that if the conditions are right, a normal ground lease of 4000,- per year in 2018 would probably be a ridiculously small amount in 50 years.

The ground lease contracts I know are linked to a consumer price index and are regularly adjusted. Now in the low interest phase, ground lease is the absolute opposite of the royal road, in my opinion it is simply a knockout criterion at the moment for not taking this property.

The ground lease contracts I know are tied to a consumer price index and are regularly adjusted. Now, in the low interest rate phase, ground lease is the exact opposite of the royal road, in my opinion it is simply a knockout criterion at the moment for not taking this property.

Why shouldn't that be a feasible way at the moment? The consumer price index is not rising faster than usual either...

Conditions are right that a normal ground lease of 4000,- per year in 2018 would probably be a ridiculously small amount in 50 years.

The churches are not stupid anymore either. My parents-in-law took over a lease from grandpa (now around 60); back then the lease was somehow tied to the price of some bushel or other (and for decades the index has not been updated. That means around 150€ a year.

My parents have a church lease from 1992. For a similar property, 2000€ is due; however, it is linked to the inflation rate.

Their neighbor sold, and the new ones did not take over but restarted the lease. They pay nearly 4000€; and accordingly in 50 years

Why should that not be a feasible way at the moment? The consumer price index is not rising faster than usual either...

At interest rates of 6 or 8%, ground lease might have been good. However, if money is thrown at you at 1-2%, it doesn’t really pay off.

Why not put the money into the property right away if the area/city is already fixed anyway? Properties probably increase in value more than funds, at least that's how it seems to me.

Well, that depends a lot on the region. And we are talking about Wendland here. In my perception, only slightly more attractive than Uckermark. Would a highway seriously change anything about that?

At interest rates of 6 or 8%, hereditary leasehold may have been good. However, if money is thrown at you for 1-2%, it really doesn't pay off

That only depends on which samples you look at. Good friends of ours pay 2500€ per year for 700 sqm in the Munich catchment area with good infrastructure. And you only have to finance the house first, not also 200k-300k for a plot of land in a comparable location...

Buy now. When the A14 is finished, then that place won’t be the bottom of the world anymore.

You take what is offered: there are areas where only leasehold is available and there are areas to buy. No idea what is possible in Lüchow, but it somehow remains Neverland, so relatively cheap. Building a house is also affordable.