New building with approximately 350 sqm of living space

Development Plan/Restrictions
Size of the property - 1200 sqm
Slope - No
Plot ratio - No
Floor space index - No
Building window, building line and boundary - No
Edge development - 3 meters
Number of parking spaces - Double garage - 2 parking spaces in front of the house
Number of floors - 2 full floors
Roof type - Gable roof
Style - Chalet style
Orientation -
Maximum heights/limits
Other specifications

The house will be located in a new development area. No neighboring plots have been built on yet. That is why the terrace is arranged open on one side. A bit of a courtyard character.

Requirements of the builders
Style, roof type, building type
No basement, 2 floors
Number of persons, 2 adults, 2 children
Space requirements on the ground floor, upper floor
Office: family use or home office?
Overnight guests per year - None
Open or closed architecture
Conservative or modern construction
Open kitchen, cooking island
Number of dining seats - 12
Fireplace - as a room divider
Music/stereo wall
Balcony, roof terrace - Covered terrace with storage rooms
Garage, carport - Double garage with storage room and utility room/heating
Utility garden, greenhouse - No
Further wishes/special features/daily routine, gladly also reasons why this or that should or should not be

House design
By whom is the plan from:
- Do-it-Yourself
What do you like most? Why?
For us, the perfect house
What do you dislike? Why?
We like everything, that’s why I’m asking here because maybe we overlooked something.
Price estimate according to architect/designer:
Cannot say. Father-in-law or brother-in-law has own company. The house will be timber frame construction completely done by ourselves. We can lay electrical wiring ourselves. We can pave the yard ourselves. Drywall and filling ourselves. Etc., so a lot of own work.
Personal price limit for the house, including equipment:
Preferred heating technology:

If you have to do without, which details/expansions
- you can do without: Preferably none
- you cannot do without:

Why did the design become what it is now? For example
Standard design from the planner?
Corresponding/which wishes were implemented by the architect?
A mix of many examples from various magazines...
What makes it particularly good or bad in your eyes?

Honestly: you can hardly see anything because especially in the small rooms the dimensions are entered overlapping. Then a north arrow and furnishings are missing, as well as a site plan. And what exactly you like and why would also be helpful.

You write that it’s best to leave everything as it is because you like it. No one can imagine from this template what or why you like it. The rooms are individual boxes without furniture, a long, narrow corridor, etc.... For such a large project, I would definitely involve a capable architect because - big - can easily go wrong without a coherent overall concept. The "usual" house floor plans that we all have more or less can be judged more easily, but certainly not this one in an appropriate way. I believe that, as a layperson (i.e., non-architect), one should be cautious.

The guest WC is 1.50m x 2.40m The storage room 1.80m x 4.90m Hallway width 1.50m The rest can be easily seen. What kind of site plan? There are undeveloped plots around. Minimum distance from each building part at least 3 meters to the next property. I have entered the furnishings as we imagine. The bathroom still needs to be planned. But I think the bathrooms are big enough, we will get bathtub, shower, sink, etc. in there. What we especially like is the open living/dining area with fireplace. Small dining table in the kitchen. Large dining table for the family (1.20m x 4m) Parents' area with dressing room and bathroom. Separate bathroom for the children. Enter the house through the garage. Terrace with a slight courtyard character. Lots of storage space. We just like everything.

furnished

The dream house ideas incorporated into the draft you will probably recognize all at once yourself – but likely no one else. For the outside observer, unfortunately – and fundamentally, including people who have already accompanied a thousand construction projects here – the drawings represent a collection of rooms that are alternately huge and questionably adequately sized. A concept from your mind did not manage to become visible in the drawings. The house size in any case demands an above-average dual-income household (both spouses on the level of chief physician / prime minister). The reality sees it differently that "relatives have a construction company" and "the house costs nothing" would be the same. By the way, sharing from my sewing box from over three and a half years in this forum: the most botched, unbuildable, and/or unaffordable designs regularly come from people who professionally deal with technical drawings but unfortunately not as architects, and who often used software, for example, for mechanical engineers.