At first glance, I thought it was good, but on a second look, a few things caught my attention that would somehow bother me. I'm not a floor plan expert, but on a second look, it seems like it feels a bit tight at the bottom and the remaining square meters got burned up at the top. Also, it seems as if there was a wish list for the planner and they tried to cram everything in somehow. Maybe some of it only after the basic concept was already there. Maybe that led to the questionable exterior views. (Oh right, there are also corner windows, stupidly they somehow don't fit into the kitchen, oh well, then just into the study.)
- I don't know if I would want the sofa starting directly next to the kitchen. Especially since the width for the sofa doesn't look generous.
- I don't like the "bay window." Not because I fundamentally have anything against it, but because in my opinion it is not a gain in space and rather disrupts things. The bathroom is uncomfortable and on the ground floor the space gain still isn't enough. But it does cost quite a bit. What I would consider:
Remove the bay window, instead a flat roof extension only on the ground floor along the length of the dining/kitchen area. Probably cost-neutral but more effective and clearer. It relieves spots where it feels tight. More width for living/kitchen. More options. Switch kitchen and dining? Or move the island at the bottom of the plan to the house wall, more surface and storage space. Upstairs might need some reshuffling but there would still be space.