Multigenerational house (two parties) on existing plot

  • Erstellt am 2021-02-16 21:37:35

nordanney

2021-02-17 09:31:12
  • #1
Then make sure a bank agrees to that. They want finished properties. If you want KFW funding, it won't work without a bathroom either. Just a thought.
 

RomeoZwo

2021-02-17 09:33:28
  • #2
The problem could be that someone in the municipality has thought about the boundaries of the development plans and decided why up to one corner 2 full floors are allowed and then only 1+ attic floor. Your advantage will be that the plan is probably quite old and the "decision-makers" from back then are no longer in office. Exceptions with arguments like densification, neighboring development, different roof shape, etc. are then more likely. To upgrade the apartment with an upper floor portion (i.e., yours), a construction method with a recessed top floor might then also be possible, resulting in a "penthouse feeling."
 

EineEULE

2021-02-17 09:44:18
  • #3
: Thanks for the hint regarding the bathroom and KfW - the building financer only told me about two residential units visible on the plan for the subsidy - I definitely need to do some research, as that is exactly what's intended. Regarding financing, it's relatively simple, as the building plot significantly leverages the total value of the house, i.e. for a hypothetical 500k house, the building plot adds 250k ground value on top, which is basically equity. I also have quite a bit of equity myself, so the financing requirement will be somewhere around 300-350k based on a first rough calculation.

: Does it make sense to sound something like this out with the municipality? Personally, I don't know the current decision-makers, but my parents of course still have "connections" to them, or should something like this be done directly with the district office? As I said, I would try to keep the deviations as low as possible - a hip roof is already planned per se, but not the house height or two full floors. However, this currently represents the minimum in our region due to chronic shortage of building land. The municipality is fully built up except for the last building plot - there are only isolated building gaps in private ownership. Therefore, I assume a good argument basis for two residential units. Possibly I might have to be persuaded to rent it out...
 

ypg

2021-02-17 10:46:40
  • #4
Your favorite conflicts with the development plan. Of course it is quite old, but the development plan does not significantly restrict building a house with the generous floor area ratio/building coverage ratio. You are allowed to build over 260 sqm, which can easily accommodate a decent bungalow, even with a ground-level granny flat. Just because there are other development plans doesn’t mean the existing one does not apply to this property. The purpose of a development plan is to ensure a recognizable structure within an area. Yes, at some point there is a border and a different area adjoins… If it were so absurd that comfortable living space could not be built, it would be worth challenging it. But if you only want a mainstream city villa, standard or nice-to-have, that won’t work. Nope Links no, description and pictures gladly :) I’m rather seeing a bungalow, with an adjoining annex for a granny flat, if the building envelope allows. In the attic you can fit a home office with a hobby room or the children’s rooms. The floor area ratio is a dream! You would have to build your city villa on another plot, but then a ground-level granny flat might be difficult.
 

apokolok

2021-02-17 11:30:42
  • #5
All well and good, but building living space half-finished that might maybe be needed in 15 years is simply a crazy idea. It has to be solved differently.
For example, buying a ground floor apartment nearby and renting it out until it is needed.
As currently planned, nothing good can come of it.
 

icandoit

2021-02-17 12:53:25
  • #6
I took a look at the mentioned draft of Massa Haus.

The ground floor could work. However, the granny flat is certainly not barrier-free.

A hipped roof complicates the lighting. Two floors are not feasible anyway. But with a gable roof, you can accommodate the usual bedroom, 2 kids' rooms, and bathroom.

I cannot imagine that the building authority would approve a city villa.

Create a solid concept first, then a preliminary building inquiry if you want to deviate from the development plan.

Post the plot plan.
 

Similar topics
13.02.2015KfW Energy Efficient Building11
03.08.2015Semi-detached house with 2 residential units KFW10
10.05.2016KfW funding for two-family house26
09.01.2017Newly built city villa with a granny flat and double garage72
01.05.2021KfW loan + repayment grant for granny flat39
10.12.2017Second residential unit in the house due to KfW funding 15313
03.11.2019House contract Massa Haus GmbH from Simmern - Preparation10
20.06.2020House construction - Massa Haus GmbH or alternative?10
05.10.2020Questions about the development plan (full floors, knee wall)11
18.11.2021KfW funding for KfW 40 Plus houses from now and from 01.07.202157
08.05.2021New building with granny flat - general contractor restricts rental and KfW funding51
14.06.2022KfW BEG funding stopped 261, 262, 263, 264, 461, 463, 4641239
19.07.2023Double KFW 297 funding through two residential units?16
01.03.2025Development plan - permitted roof shapes for transverse gables15
10.03.2025Building despite residential units/multi-family house stipulated in the development plan20

Oben