Bieber0815
2017-04-20 20:48:00
- #1
A developer would actually sell the house and land in one (purchase) contract. He (the developer) then acts as the builder (he can delegate this to a subcontractor). The buyer takes over the house and above all the rights and obligations only upon acceptance (transfer of risk). Real estate transfer tax and notary fees are calculated on the total price. The purchase is not subject to VAT.
Here the "developer" tries to shift the builder role to the buyer. He forcibly sells the land in connection with a contract for work on building a house. In this case, the buyer is then in the role of the builder. The tax office and notary recognize this and calculate their taxes and fees (nowadays) on the entire amount. The construction service is subject to VAT.
Notaries warn against the second variant. It apparently used to work to save real estate transfer tax, but as far as I know, this is hardly the case today.
IMHO(!) the second variant combines the disadvantages of buying from a developer (developer drawbacks) with those of a custom-built house (no price guarantee, having to bear various builder responsibilities and risks). Ideally, one can build freely on their own land (developer-free). If using a developer, then properly.
(Since real developers purchase a lot from suppliers and pass on the VAT incurred to the buyer, the VAT issue practically makes no difference. The end customer always pays.)
Here the "developer" tries to shift the builder role to the buyer. He forcibly sells the land in connection with a contract for work on building a house. In this case, the buyer is then in the role of the builder. The tax office and notary recognize this and calculate their taxes and fees (nowadays) on the entire amount. The construction service is subject to VAT.
Notaries warn against the second variant. It apparently used to work to save real estate transfer tax, but as far as I know, this is hardly the case today.
IMHO(!) the second variant combines the disadvantages of buying from a developer (developer drawbacks) with those of a custom-built house (no price guarantee, having to bear various builder responsibilities and risks). Ideally, one can build freely on their own land (developer-free). If using a developer, then properly.
(Since real developers purchase a lot from suppliers and pass on the VAT incurred to the buyer, the VAT issue practically makes no difference. The end customer always pays.)