Land planning with forest protection strips

  • Erstellt am 2023-08-06 09:47:08

TSven1979

2023-08-06 13:11:13
  • #1
Here is the floor plan for the variant "Carport on the west side": The text is like this because of the mirroring.
 

TSven1979

2023-08-06 13:13:33
  • #2
Oh, the maximum width of the carport on the house side would be 5.50 meters for two cars. There is no more space in the building envelope.
 

11ant

2023-08-06 13:35:46
  • #3
It seems to me that it has a different release status than in the opening post. An aerial photo would be helpful as said before. What is this "tree protection strip" supposed to be anyway (?) - apparently, a tree falling boundary is not meant here, I also do not see existing trees or their roots to be protected here, but a multitude of berry bushes to be planted (tasty, but more of a thicket in terms of garden design). In the site plan, I would have at least expected a directly adjacent forest, as if I remember correctly from - then I could have reasonably understood the forest edge planting. In the site plan, it now looks more like a parceled farmstead area. I, however, with no bed in the corner, but turning possibility over the entire width.
 

Nida35a

2023-08-06 13:37:45
  • #4

I would submit it like that and have it approved, and next to the driveway put a few grass pavers for daily use, not a parking space.
 

TSven1979

2023-08-06 13:39:20
  • #5

Release? That is the subdivision plan from the surveyor, the other is our property site planning.
A tree protection strip is restricted in the development, only access paths are allowed. Everything else is within the building area. This is building law and has nothing to do with personal judgment, so unfortunately we have to accept it as given. It is a forest area, yes.
 

11ant

2023-08-06 13:52:22
  • #6
Floor plans can be mirrored - the sun still rises in the east anyway :-) If there is a different basis for the overview than for the details, then really the aerial photo is best. It still requires justification, and the conditions in the site plan look (arbitrarily) different. Especially with such inconvenient restrictions, I would want to know exactly on what basis they are imposed and how water-tight this is.
 

Similar topics
12.09.2022Feedback on our floor plan idea, small building window127
21.01.2015Extending building land around garden land - Effects on building envelope20
15.08.2016Property - Building window - Location of house and garage44
11.07.2016Question about site plan - is a 3m distance mandatory?12
18.10.2016Plan location of house & garage within building window *Pre-planning*129
12.12.2016Basement yes or no with a large building window?12
04.04.2017Building without building window NRW13
31.01.2017Building window on the corridor map - approval39
18.01.2019Development plan: Garage on the boundary outside the building window53
24.09.2018Is the land use plan binding? Possibly a building window in forest area?!31
20.11.2018development plan, building line, building boundary, building window14
31.10.2019Single-family house 180-190 sqm on a 10x20m building plot, first draft general contractor78
18.03.2021How strictly must developers adhere to the site plan?10
29.03.2021Which building window in Paragraph 3414
09.05.2021Placement of house, terrace, carport & co. in the building window40
12.01.2022Union of two plots - redefine the building envelope?20
08.11.2024Concrete building size in the construction window unclear32
03.02.2025Building window and boundary construction new development area22
20.06.2025Semi-detached house in building area 8.5m x 15m (WxD)76

Oben