ypg
2022-06-13 09:20:52
- #1
I rather see it as a planning offer. But I see it rather neutrally and take no position. I too can understand the displeasure. I felt like over the weekend in at least 10 threads I understood the displeasure of OPs, but it doesn’t help for the answer if it’s the rule, and the answer is simply like that. And honestly: it’s similar with house building, if not exactly the same: which general contractor commits himself in his scope of work description? Only the high-priced ones... and that only after the contract is signed. The comparison is a bit flawed, I know. But it is like this: if kitchen planners give everything out, the consumer first researches on the internet whether they are paying 50€ too much. We’ve already gone over this topic here dozens of times… The data of the requested appliances was given, a plan was created, an amount named. And now the OP doesn’t trust the seller that the appliances are really included. She will get this data if she takes the kitchen. In between is a black hole… by the way, there is a book about buying kitchens!I can understand the OP. Actually, the whole thing is supposed to be an offer. But an offer is a one-sided declaration of intent with a binding character. But if I don’t even know what is being bound by it, the whole thing is null and void. It can be changed later at any time by the person processing it.