Keyless access systems

So for me, only transponder systems would be an option regarding security and tamper resistance. Disadvantage: You can lose the transponder again... I am still working on the acceptance of the injection solution Because you can't just shoot the little glass transponders under the cat's skin. The owner still refuses^^

The transponder can also be tampered with using appropriate methods - it’s always assumed that you need something ultra secure at the front. They break in where it is easiest and most invisible.

But first, the person has to know that the door opens with a transponder, and where to find it... Even if the person knew that, reading these short-range transponders without being noticed would likely be very, very difficult. Especially if, for example, it is located under the skin on the wrist. When opening, you only touch the door handle; the reader is invisibly built into the handle and voilà, door open. However, this requires an independent power supply, otherwise it becomes inconvenient during a power outage^^

Exactly, the prospect of quick success attracts thieves. And if the door doesn't even have a visible lock, the choice is probably made immediately. Visibility and accessibility of the garden must of course be considered.

For me, it's not even primarily about high security, that's just a benefit. But never having to carry, look for, or forget keys again is already very interesting

You can also manipulate the transponder with appropriate means - people always think they need something ultra secure in the front. They break in where it is easiest and most invisible.

Basically, I agree. You can't expect absolute security, it doesn't exist anyway, but rather to compare the transponder or fingerprint system with the common key. I don't see a significant disadvantage to the "new" systems.

But. If the mentioned systems really become vulnerable, for whatever reason (general security flaw, transponder deliberately read out, fingerprint copied, etc.), I have the problem of proof. Without signs of a break-in, there was no break-in, without a break-in no money from the insurance. At least that's how it is today.
In addition, attacks on electronic systems are silent, which makes it enormously difficult for neighbors to detect them.

Helping out - anything else would be fatal

Mmh, too bad, that does not correspond to my expectations.

The setting of the daytime function is more than uncomfortable.

As an uninformed person, I had the expectation that all bolts would extend, even if it is sufficient for the Vds that only the two top and bottom jump out.

My wishes are:

1. Absence mode:
I close the door last in the morning on weekdays and the door locks completely, EMA active via bolt contact. Possibly trigger locking process via second finger.

2. Presence mode:
I close the door without the bolt extending (my understanding of daytime unlocking). Quick light opening without the entire lock mechanism being strained.

I suspect the A-opener is a linear motor that only pulls in one direction (opening) but cannot actively "lock"? Then the desired range of functions will not be available with GU-SECURY?