akanezumi
2022-08-10 10:31:50
- #1
As already mentioned, the additional costs for a deep drilling will probably not be economically worthwhile. Nevertheless, it is the more efficient and less error-prone heating system. And you can cool more cheaply in summer than with an air-water heat pump.
We also live in a water protection area IIIa (Lower Saxony). We were directly prohibited from deep drilling. The local water authority then directed me to near-surface geothermal energy (ring trench collector). However, three quarters of a year later, they did not want to hear anything about it when granting the permit. I would have been allowed to operate the ring trench only with pure water (water hazard class 0). That is not really sensible... therefore, for us it will unfortunately(!) only be an air-water heat pump now. I would have accepted the additional costs, especially for the cheaper cooling in summer... I find it particularly annoying that there are some deep drillings in the immediate vicinity... we were unfortunately two years too late :-/
We also live in a water protection area IIIa (Lower Saxony). We were directly prohibited from deep drilling. The local water authority then directed me to near-surface geothermal energy (ring trench collector). However, three quarters of a year later, they did not want to hear anything about it when granting the permit. I would have been allowed to operate the ring trench only with pure water (water hazard class 0). That is not really sensible... therefore, for us it will unfortunately(!) only be an air-water heat pump now. I would have accepted the additional costs, especially for the cheaper cooling in summer... I find it particularly annoying that there are some deep drillings in the immediate vicinity... we were unfortunately two years too late :-/