HilfeHilfe
2019-12-13 09:54:49
- #1
I found the inquiry rather arrogant and arrogant and a warning finger below the first post:Content and factual relevance are one thing, appropriate, non-violent communication another. The way you express yourself, one might think you are schadenfreude, happily hitting on it again.
The post I just quoted is once again a prime example. This thread is about a young family that has suffered several strokes of fate. And you talk about pity for poor dogs. The image of humanity you paint here is abysmally deep. I don't know if it's intentional or if you don't even notice, but it runs like a red thread throughout.
Definitely fits the "do-gooder" rhetoric.
S.: since I have also had bad experiences after I have written/spoken at length about (soon) 5 children, some with care level as well as Schufa: comments about my/our lifestyle, responsibility towards children, "children only because of child benefit", "your poverty disgusts me", "Schufa, there are only antisocial people listed there!" etc. are inappropriate. No one knows about the why and how, only me and my wife...
and honestly, but this is my personal opinion. If you have 4 partly care-dependent children, a low income from work that is leveraged by care allowance, and a small living space, then get pregnant again and expect your 5th child? Sorry, I lack any social understanding in that regard. And yes, I have to pay for that in the solidarity community. So now you may attack my opinion again. Yes, it is not socially minded!!