Hello,
so the 30-35k additional construction costs are already included, right?
Yes.
How much of that is consumed by the basement?
Good 40,000 EUR
What additional costs would be necessary for KfW70 or what needs to be done? Controlled residential ventilation, better insulation, etc.?
I can’t answer that for you; district heating is not that simple. The structural engineer/technical building equipment planner must calculate precisely – for example, when calculating the KfW 70 efficiency standard, it also depends on how the district heating is classified energetically, etc.
With the heat pump, I’m also dependent on the electricity provider... right?
Sort of, since the electricity market had to be opened, you can switch providers every year – if you want to. The big advantage is that you
can switch; with district heating, that isn’t the case. In the long term, future builders will no longer ask
if they heat with electricity, but
how the electricity is generated. In the short to medium term, photovoltaics and their storage will also become cheaper – if you accept the district heating connection, this investment would not pay off just for household electricity; but if a heat pump is installed, the situation looks very different again. Small wind turbines are also being tested, as well as other innovative and future-proof technologies like fuel cells, for example. In my opinion, you are making the mistake of looking at the current costs/a supposed saving and not focusing on future costs/opportunities.
As I said, I don’t know the construction industry well, but in almost all other industries there are often discounts when you buy more... If you buy two cars from the dealer around the corner, you can probably negotiate more... without giving up anything on the cars!
Car dealerships are sponsored by manufacturers through different subsidy models; if you buy re-imports, different tax rates apply – all not comparable. When building a car, only one “craftsman” is at work, with house building, several more are involved. Since the craft companies that have long-term contracts with larger suppliers don’t earn the most anyway, they can hardly afford to forego further profits. A well-established craft business that knows how to value its delivered services, that has several “mouths to feed” or is responsible to its employees, will definitely not engage in this “being cheap is cool” game; because then their good reputation and solvency would soon be gone anyway ;)
I don’t want to save on these things either... but there are also some things that correspond to a large single-family house... for example, with masonry or roofing or plastering, you can certainly save money or negotiate volume discounts... but okay, I won’t expect too much here... the 10% mentioned sounded a bit high to me anyway... thought more in the range of 5-10k...
You can
supposedly only save when building a house if you contract all trades yourself, starting with the architect and ending with the door maker; according to all experience, however, you don’t really save because you invest the seemingly saved funds in better craft companies/higher quality materials or simply cannot negotiate the discounts you apparently envision.
And one thing you should definitely keep in mind: the providers who grant more than 1, maximum 2% discount upon signing:
- have already screwed you in the beginning
- are latently affected by insolvency
- sooner or later you will find them negatively in the HBF or the media
Building as cheaply as possible and as expensively as necessary is absolutely desirable. Comparing house building with buying a car, on the other hand, is very foolish and in most cases ends up being very expensive in the final bill; true to the motto “after quite firm comes quite loose” ;)
Best regards