We would prefer not to widen the garage, as that would come at the expense of the already small garden.
Where is the passage supposed to lead? You are keeping something from us...The 1.55 at the back provides space for a narrow passage,
At the moment, I don’t even know what you want.Apparently, we wanted too much and will now change a few things again.
It would be polite to shed some light on what I criticized in #10.The option with the entrance area in the east is great and we will implement it that way, even if it completely wrecks the current floor plan. In fact, we have already received the green light for the setback areas and would only shorten the third gable a little in that regard.
I am also in the camp: better to give up three meters at the back than to give up three meters in the front. You notice it in the front, not in the back.that ultimately makes 0.5 m of garden.
I will reconsider the widening of the garage. I would take the rest along for the new attempt. There is no parking space regulation here that would restrict us. I am attaching a floor plan that we might aim for...I have corrected my draft. Earlier I only adjusted the text. Now also the house.
That would be the deliberate withholding of information and that is not the case. We left this passage open after consulting with the neighbors. In addition, the garage closes off with the neighbor's fence.Where is the passage supposed to lead? You're hiding something from us...
We are both totally uncreative and only have our ideas about the number of rooms. I am attaching an enlarged view of the site plan again....I don't even know what you want at the moment.
