For the 34er, it makes sense to show a larger section of GoogleMaps. The state building code/LK can also help.
With the distance violations here, I can only make sense of it by assuming that it’s because you didn’t ask the expert about the most sensible development or didn’t consult him, but instead recited something to him.
Then he hopes, because the further development is distant, that it will be approved that way.
At first, I also thought that the yellow area at the bottom of the plan was a street – now I realize that not even a legend has been added. Overall, so much information is missing to assess whether the tight location can still be considered reasonable. And yes, instead of this, one waives corner development of the garage, whatever the 1.55 are supposed to be for.
And to my knowledge, the distance rules also apply in the 34er.
Architect according to our specifications
That’s also why this angled entrance area exists, possibly to place the wardrobe here.
The more I look at it, the more I think: time for a new start. The angled views, the position of the rooms cannot be assessed due to lack of surroundings, except for the odd fact that the utility room and WC are on the south side.
Regarding sizes: over 20 sqm for the master bedroom, just under 14, smaller than the bathroom, for the kids.
A space-wasting kitchen that is also hard to furnish. I think that with ’s suggestion you get a bit more breathing room where you want it, but inside you’ll again face problems. But we’ll see about that. Overall, it’s difficult with a “too small” plot for big wishes.