Tessa22
2020-09-21 12:20:19
- #1
If you redesign the upper floor, then please remove the bedroom from the south side (assuming the terrace is on the south side) and rather give the children's rooms the nice south side. Bedroom and dressing room to the back, where Child1 and Child2 currently are, children's rooms on the sunny side.
You want to save qms, but the ground floor should remain as it is. Are you then doing a staggered floor? That isn't exactly cheap either and I wonder if you will achieve the desired result with it (namely to be significantly cheaper). In my opinion, the ground floor would also have to be slightly reduced and then the question arises whether the straight staircase can be kept – it really requires a lot of space.
Don't get me wrong: the floor plan is workable, but you mainly want to become a bit smaller.
Before everyone starts tinkering here: please state clearly by how much the overall design has to be smaller and whether a staggered floor is even allowed in the development plan and whether that is what you want.
So staggered floors are rather undesirable. I see it like you do regarding the costs.
I would like to reduce the ground floor by 10 sqm and the upper floor as well. Then it would be perfect. My current thought now based on the ideas here:
Remove the airspace
Reduce the airlock to 8. Simply a barrier about 4.90 meters long and hooks, and on the other side take something away in the dining area and have the hallway and table crosswise.
This way I would save about 1 meter in the width of the house downstairs, and upstairs, due to removing the second hallway and the access to the bathroom, I think and reducing the size of the office, it could work well.