Children…
We have already discussed other expressions before, that they should not be avoided due to a lack of descriptiveness, but because there are “affected” people who feel offended due to the history of the term.
is right that “no arms, no cookies” was simply burned out by the crude disability jokes. Content-wise, the meaning of the phrase fits the information input of the OP 100% – but that does not mean it should be used. There are alternatives to the expression.
“Highways” and “shepherd dogs” neither have offended affected people in the background, nor are there alternatives to express what they stand for. They are not an argument for nothing.
The film that means is probably “The Intouchables,” which deliberately plays with the humor of disability jokes to achieve a certain effect.
Is that what you meant, ypg?
I really wouldn’t make such a big deal out of it. Better to explain WHY something is problematic instead of shooting someone down with an accusatory finger. It achieves more and harms less.
And : No info, no useful help. The idea of getting concrete partial suggestions, which can only be properly evaluated as a whole (that’s how it is with house building), is fundamentally wrong.
Good tips only come when the requested information is provided. If you don’t understand why that is, you haven’t understood a fundamental principle of house planning yet.