yes, I wanted to minimize the circulation areas. is that wrong?
Sort of. It is not "wrong," but paradoxically, it backfires with an extremely high success rate. When laymen try to minimize circulation areas, labyrinths regularly emerge whose total area swells (anti)proportionally to the efforts at economizing. Like in the "template" of the sorcerer's apprentice: the split brooms bring twice as much water. I consider it extremely important to strictly and rigorously separate the two pairs of shoes A) "enjoyment of one’s own planning games" and B) "working on the serious planning process," at least as much as service and schnapps. Not all architects are talented planners, but most are at least well trained, and in any case 99.75% of them are no "star architects." I also perceive the latter as rightly avoided, which fortunately is quite easy, since the candidates proudly boast of their otherworldly palaces on their websites. Since I am "only" active nationwide as an architect finder in Germany, I personally know only one in Austria. But successful architect search is no sorcery. Further hints on unsuitable candidates can be found here especially in those of my posts where is mentioned. And possibly architects of houses discussed here from "your league" ;-) also work in Austria - I’ll call , , and into the discussion ;-)
You can also talk with architects. For example, I spoke with one who was a fan of a certain construction method and always raved about it. Well, after two preliminary discussions it was clear: we do not get along.
And quite plainly, many architects are also visually recognizable whether they count themselves among the disciples of a very specific "school": by the Gropius bow tie, the Corbusier glasses, or the Saab in front of the door ...
*) the architect should have taken the opportunity to make at least two of their own napkin sketches before the client shows them their own planning attempts