I am relocating the front door and the stairs. What's left of the floor plan is practically nothing. Maybe the office at the bottom right of the plan.
This also roughly corresponds to my expectation of the low correspondence of a better design with the one submitted.
Here you come again with your instead-villa... You spin pirouettes with your answers without being constructive.
This claim is boldly false: in post #16 I last gave a detailed diagnosis including very easy-to-implement therapy recommendations, as well as (with an even simpler, concise single measure in post #24).
#1 importing a floor plan template must inevitably fail if this template has a different "family status";
#2 draftsmen are trained to distill working plans from positively tested functional designs,
but not to develop their own designs or modifications;
#3 the indentation of the ground floor has the annoying effect of unnecessarily compressing the living space, and at the same time
#4 as a shading measure against the morning sun, it is an utterly exaggerated measure.
And what is true must remain true: the current design uses floor plans of the category "instead-villa of the most standard kind," while a gable roof would be fitting for a city villa without quotation marks, for a "city villa" aka instead-villa, it is almost a cheeky variation.
So, I summarize the measures:
#A only with a room program and wish list, but explicitly without a template
#B go to an independent architect instead of a general contractor inclusive planner
#C don’t be surprised if they develop the more difficult floor first
All of these are simple measures - but by no means a reason for the claim that I gave no advice, but only confined myself to mocking the quotation mark city villa :-(