Floor plan for an ugly plot shape

  • Erstellt am 2019-10-14 08:29:17

kaho674

2019-10-15 07:45:11
  • #1
I think now it’s about time to fill out the questionnaire. Otherwise, we will have to ask all the open questions one by one. Maybe you start a new thread right away and link from here to there, so that the questionnaire appears at the beginning of the thread. https://www.hausbau-forum.de/threads/grundrissplanung-unbedingt-vor-Beitrag-Erstellung-lesen.11714/

Building such a curve can be refreshing, but do you even have the money for it? You can’t build a roof like that with helpers from Romania, and with Massa Haus or Living Haus you surely won’t get that from the preconfigured options. Living Haus rather builds standard.
 

hampshire

2019-10-15 10:31:23
  • #2
Round roof goes with thatch... I still think that a small plot with a large house screams for a roof terrace – and that totally inconspicuously with a shed roof look. [ATTACH alt="C04BD7F4-6675-491F-BAE4-BDE594CDB316.jpeg" type="full"]38975[/ATTACH][ATTACH alt="73354272-D447-4D2B-A16A-8BD708BCC6DA.jpeg" type="full"]38976[/ATTACH] I scribbled a bit.
 

fach1werk

2019-10-31 08:11:41
  • #3
Reducing corridor areas: This does not mean making corridors narrower. It means looking at how the movement patterns in a house are arranged and aligning the sequence of rooms accordingly. Individual corridor sections can be reassigned as movement space to a room by changing the order of the rooms. In your case, there are internal corridors; if you want to keep them, I would consider light wells. The installation is simple; you would roughly, very roughly, have to budget four figures per piece, starting with a one. Hopefully, you enjoy the work of Le Corbusier! Nevertheless, I would like to point out that if you design everything yourself, you cannot get much beyond the first semester. The house has to be built at some point. You would greatly benefit from an architect who can apply the appropriate existing knowledge according to your requirements. Enjoy, Gabriele
 

ypg

2019-10-31 10:47:29
  • #4


To be honest, that was not sufficient for me.
I am definitely missing property boundaries. Why are you so stingy with the information regarding the plan? Also, it looks like contour lines are drawn there. Those must not be ignored.


It doesn’t look like it is necessary to include the curve in the house construction.
The fact is that you have to be able to afford something like that. You cannot buy something like that off the shelf, only from an architect. By the way, the architect is also the intermediary between the builder and the building authority and gets the best out of the development plan. I am talking about an architect and not about a €1999 flat-rate planner working part-time.

Sticking to a defiant attitude usually does not bring out the best for oneself.


Right... strange idea. Delete, do not keep!

By the way, I see no reason to place a house with 2 residential units and a basement on a small, badly shaped corner plot.
Since the property is not a means to an end for arguing with the building authority, but rather the other way around, the building authority only has the role of not allowing any negative unauthorized peculiarity with the house, I would now focus on something realistic.

Information about the property is still missing to evaluate this.
 

11ant

2019-10-31 19:04:54
  • #5
What makes you think of him here right now?

That is correct, even if here it is probably only one or one and a half meters in the building window (I assume the dashed line is a half-meter line). But the crucial point is not visible in the excerpt: namely whether the slope goes upward or downward.

I suspect the intention is to accumulate as much garden space as possible at the upper side of the plan or to keep the part of the plot not useful as a garden and not built on as small as possible – which logically results in following the outline of the plot in the other areas. However, this conclusion is only apparently obvious – namely as long as one ignores that it could be a disservice to oneself. I also consider the latter to be true here: namely in the form that one only brings the "loss areas" into the house with it, especially into the hallway and staircase.

I therefore join the suggestion for a paradigm shift (to choose a house with a more "standard" floor plan shape and thereby accept gaining a few more square meters of living value at the expense of sacrificing the empty calorie nominal square meters).
 

fach1werk

2019-10-31 22:46:32
  • #6
Why Corbusier of all people? He often based his work on human measurements. I find that worth learning when dimensioning rooms. You don't have to like living machines, but you can clearly see in his small buildings how and why he arranged things. I think there is still much to learn from that. Much about his work fascinates me; fortunately, I am not too far from the Weissenhof Estate.
Best regards
Gabriele
 

Similar topics
28.08.2013Separate land and generate building land? Where to inquire?14
14.11.2013Our floor plan of 120 sqm on a 469 sqm plot73
28.12.2013Conversion of agricultural land to building plot, objection, building authority, building regulations12
26.02.2015Floor plan house / property28
01.04.2015Land is available - prerequisite to build 2.5 stories!16
10.04.2015Cost estimate architect single-family house. Your assessment44
13.08.2016Variable or fixed financing for land?11
17.04.2017Is land and house construction possible with our income?43
03.11.2019House contract Massa Haus GmbH from Simmern - Preparation10
25.02.2020Assessment of property sought - Article 34 redevelopment11
30.11.2020Building Authority Problems - Purchased a Defective Plot56
20.06.2020House construction - Massa Haus GmbH or alternative?10
12.12.2020Commitment to the property and what comes next53
24.01.2021Plot - Ideas and suggestions on orientation and development plan33
10.08.2021Floor plan design new single-family house 2-storey approx. 135 sqm42

Oben