ypg
2018-09-28 14:26:12
- #1
In my circle of acquaintances, I asked for opinions on this and almost everyone said it would be strange as a guest to have to go directly down a staircase into the "basement".
I find it rather stranger as a tenant in a terraced house not to be able to reach my terrace/garden above the living area. Screw the guests. The focus on tenant/guest is wrong here.
You should be able to pass by a normal car.
Maybe Twiggy... ok, me too still ... but definitely not a mother with two small children by the hand or with a stroller...
The idea is that you don’t have to go through one of the (bed-/children’s rooms) to get to the garden.
I don’t see the point. So the person upstairs can use the garden downstairs. Ok... but outdoor seating and gardening are separated. I wouldn’t like that, I wouldn’t rent it. Instead, the children’s room terrace doors have to be secured again so that no child accidentally flies the coop.
My experience is also that a nice garden in a house or semi-detached house is also appreciated in the rent.
If I can use it unrestrictedly, yes. But I don’t see that here.
The problem with the planning here is that you want a fancy house from the outside, but inside it doesn’t offer what the outside promises.
If I rent a semi-detached house or terraced house as a tenant, I want to have a garden. Somehow the design and the garden part are also reflected in the rent price—I probably get more value for money in a condominium than here.
Also, you are planning for 4 people (family), but the house is not family-friendly. I see at most yuppie couples there, but then the entrance/carport situation speaks against that again. (Yuppie -> 2 cars, presentable entrance)
As a builder/landlord you should assess the role more economically—you can build your dream house with the façade design yourself. A semi-detached house for families has to work for the residents, not for the guests.