kati1337
2022-11-19 19:49:39
- #1
I think when it comes to the requirements, an architect should be given free rein to develop a design that meets your budget and needs. For a project that surely nears a million, I wouldn’t consider my amateur sketch as the ultimate wisdom and have it drafted neatly.
I can only agree with that. For our first house build, we had a good general contractor’s floor plan as a basis. Those are usually quite efficiently devised and are often built exactly like that. We tinkered with it somewhat (back then we still thought: optimized for us), and after living there for 2 years, we noticed a flaw in every one of our “optimizations.” The house was still a great house, of course. But what I mean is: We are not architects; we shouldn’t try to do their job. For this house build, we went straight to a professional with our written list of requirements and had them design it for us. And this time it feels completely different. We go to professionals with every other issue. For a health problem to the doctor, for legal disputes to a lawyer, and for inspections to the car workshop. Only when it comes to designs for our houses, where it usually involves a large part of our net income for the next 30 years, we always seem to think, “ah, never mind whether that’s a field of study, I can do that myself.” ;)