ypg
2024-04-08 12:34:46
- #1
Well… that is hardly an option for the OP when you put the individual components together. The budget is barely sufficient, certainly not for an external architect, which is why it’s a general contractor house build. The mentioned must-haves are being counted on…
None of us can solve the problem, and the advice is even less advisory.
I myself like to help people, but I do not expect the same in return and am therefore somewhat cautious about writing novels here and uploading long contracts/construction service specifications.
to completely start over;
even better: to have an architectural plan “Module A” with donor floor plan review in the dough rest with course setting;
i.e. no tinkering with this design.
Whatever that is supposed to mean, that the council is not advisory
I am not talking here about the architect in the scope of services phases 1 to 8, but explicitly for module A. A general contractor catalog house is only suitable for people to whom it fits, i.e., normal families (2 adults 2 children), which is not the case with the thread starter. And one does not go to a general contractor unprotected as a customer, but as a victim. This is especially true for big names. What you mainly have to be able to afford regarding an architect is: to dispense with him. Although this brilliant suggestion to save time by stopping the clock doesn’t even come from the thread starter (who here is by no means a Sims-house self-design gambler). Incidentally, to my recollection, we have not yet seen a site plan from which elevations can also be recognized—the shown design apparently assumes a slab-on-grade house, but does the plot allow for that? I don’t see the thread starter becoming happy with this model—no matter how lovingly it’s attempted to be improved.It’s pointless to stoically say “... just go to the architect.” An architect is not Penny, after all. Among other reasons, I am here in this forum to improve the simplistic, although often functional, but loveless general contractor designs. Of course, you sometimes have to rightly correct a thread starter who has too much imagination but too little experience and clearly tell them that they cannot replace the job of a professional. Most of those are the ones who bring home a pile of money every month, so they can afford a professional, yet still find time in front of the PC to build their own Sims house. There are also really great products here that have never seen a freelance architect. But what I simply find terrible: constantly having to read the same old tune under such different conditions. You shouldn’t give the same advice to someone who talks about Team Massiv and wants/must sign with Heinz von Heiden (or similar) as to someone who has 900,000€ available?!