Floor plan design of a single-family house with a 10% south slope. House entrance platform stairs

I visualized it once.

You are absolutely right.

I am now at a house with 9*11m







Floor plans are not really my thing, but I gave it a try anyway. Maybe mirror it then.




Technology in the NE.







Children’s rooms all in the south. Bathroom in the NE.
Possibly the eaves still need to be lowered. Depending on the reference point. Then the central children’s room should have a dormer or a cross gable. To structure the wide south facade you can also plan a small bay window.

I would slightly model the terrain. Delivery material is not that expensive.

Not only possibly mirror. But definitely.

I have visualized it. @ypg You are completely right.

Floor plans are not really my thing, but I gave it a try anyway. Maybe mirror it then.

Basically, if you have a budget for a 150 sqm house, then a standard floor plan works. However, beware: no podium staircase, possibly a quarter-turn staircase next to the front door. And you have to slightly reduce the room sizes on the upper floor, possibly plan with a small overhang to fit the room program. First plan the upper floor, the ground floor adapts. The exterior visualization, however, fits quite well. The excavation models the terrace. I think is a bit silent because the planning from the architect is considered rather absurd and therefore the architect doesn’t come off very well.

One might think that this thread was unnecessary or that all of this could have been spared here in the forum.
With a difficult plot of land, you have to work out your goal through brainstorming or various approaches. And not only at the kitchen table, but also here you sometimes forget the prerequisites. You go from here to there and then have to reset what is possible again. You practically work your way down from 240 sqm to 160 sqm to 150 sqm.
Here it is set: €500,000, so roughly a 150 sqm house, slope with 10%.
Then there is also the factor that the desire for children is not defined as 2, but as -3.

This makes a big difference in room planning and sizes. While you can get by with 4 meters of walking length in the kitchen with one child, with three children it is already 5. A bathroom can work well with 8 sqm, with 5 people you should possibly go for 9-10 sqm. While two people can do without space in the middle of a bathroom, space is needed with (small) children.
While two people can manage with a simple sofa in front of the TV with a depth of 3 meters, you need a second sofa at an angle, an L-sofa, or a large lounge to do justice to the children. Possibly also stools, armchairs, or a bench.
While four people can manage with a 180 cm dining table, you need at least 2 meters in length. Not to forget that children also bring visitors: one child visit with one child means 2, a child visit with three children means 6! Children at the dining table.
While one can grant a fairly spacious room to one child, with three children you try to manage nearly three equally sized rooms. And if that does not succeed, somehow a highlight is needed so that the child feels valued, for example a wider window, south-facing orientation, or a bed niche with promised cave installation.

In combination with the budget, some wishes should or must give way to effective family space planning: second entrance, second utility room on the upper floor, walk-in closet, pantry. And other extras for which I currently lack imagination.

Now there have been many rotations in the position of the house, high, low, split or not. Ultimately, the budget counts here again.
And of course you can also do a simple carport with corrugated metal, but I think the money should rather be invested in the house than in a massive roof of a carport. Whoever adds it up ends up with over 50 sqm for 2 cars, just over 40 for 3 children.

For the house, I am thinking of the floor plan of Maxime 330 in the variant with 3 children's rooms. That would fit exactly with a house length of 11.60.
The garden side would then look something like this or similar
[ATTACH alt="IMG_1250.jpeg"]92868[/ATTACH]


and yes, even such a terrace installation costs money, but it is still one of the cheapest alternatives.

P.s.: with the second house there is a floor plan included. Just ignore it, because it is too big and too long.

In principle, if you have a budget house of 150 sqm, a standard floor plan works. However, caution: without a landing staircase, possibly with a quarter-turn staircase next to the entrance door.

Yes, winding staircases are the easier solution for any design. Most likely also the cheaper one.

Instead of the straight staircase, I did not want to immediately go to the extreme. Therefore the landing staircase. Besides, my program cannot handle winding staircases. I have to plan each step individually. I only make the effort for my own design. But not for forum members who do not appreciate the work anyway.