I imagine a young, pragmatically success-oriented couple who quietly go their own way, for whom doing sports together is a central focus of life. Being able to do this freely in their own home, without external constraints, is a stronger motivation for building than the desire to establish a nest. Family planning is unclear, and if a family comes about, sports and physical activity will remain central at the same time.
The house reflects the idea that it should be equipped for all possibilities and that a “that’s just how it is nowadays” mentality plays a role in the minds of the designers. In the end, the house is too big and too expensive without really solving anything well. To solve something, it helps to let go of certain things.
For example: Are you really the sofa landscape type, or do you just believe that’s how it’s supposed to be? Or: Are you hobby cooks, or do you have a rather functional approach to meal preparation? In the evenings, are you mostly in front of the TV, or reading, talking, or active? Are you “standard”? If not, don’t desperately try to build “standard.” Then ideas will come, and the attic can be, for example, a reserve for expansion if the family grows; the house entrance doesn’t have to be centrally located; the kitchen doesn’t have to meet the standard of show homes; watching TV doesn’t primarily have to happen on the ground floor; a hallway doesn’t have to be “just” a hallway…
Maybe I’m wrong, but I have the feeling that you can be more radical and consistent. Cut off what you don’t need and build the house that fits your life and not the ideas of others.